红宝石的树形结构,其父级子级为无宝石的数组格式? [英] tree structure in ruby with parent child in array format without gems?
问题描述
我有一个数组,其中包含这样的项目列表
I have a array which have list of item like this
arr = [
{:id=>1, :title=>"A", :parent_id=>nil},
{:id=>2, :title=>"B", :parent_id=>nil},
{:id=>3, :title=>"A1", :parent_id=>1},
{:id=>4, :title=>"A2", :parent_id=>1},
{:id=>5, :title=>"A11", :parent_id=>3},
{:id=>6, :title=>"12", :parent_id=>3},
{:id=>7, :title=>"A2=121", :parent_id=>6},
{:id=>8, :title=>"A21", :parent_id=>4},
{:id=>9, :title=>"B11", :parent_id=>2},
{:id=>10, :title=>"B12", :parent_id=>2},
...
]
... ]
如果parent_id为nil,则其应为父节点,如果parent_id为
If parent_id is nil then its should be the parent node, if parent_id is not nil then it should comes under the particular parent.
基于id和parent_id,我想提供这样的响应:
Based on id and parent_id, I want to provide a response like this:
-A
-A1
-A11
-A12
-A123
-A2
-A21
-B
-B1
-B11
-B12
如何生成上述答复?
推荐答案
这比您想象的要容易,您只需要了解一些简单的事情即可:
This is easier than you think, you just need to realize a couple simple things:
-
nil
是一个完全有效的哈希键。 - 您可以使用
nil
作为树的虚拟根,以便所有:parent_id
都指向树中的东西。 - 您可以一次遍历数组并以两种方式跟踪条目:通过
:id
和通过:parent_id
。
nil
is a perfectly valid Hash key.- You can use
nil
as a virtual root for your tree so that all the:parent_id
s point at things in your tree. - You can iterate through the array and track entries in two ways at once: by
:id
and by:parent_id
.
首先是由哈希表示的树:
First a tree represented by a Hash:
tree = Hash.new { |h,k| h[k] = { :title => nil, :children => [ ] } }
我们要从根到叶子,所以我们仅对父/子关系的子级感兴趣,因此默认值:children
数组。
We're going to be going from the root to the leaves so we're only interested in the children side of the parent/child relationship, hence the :children
array in the default values.
然后进行一次简单的迭代,依次填充:title
和:children
:
Then a simple iteration that fills in the :title
s and :children
as it goes:
arr.each do |n|
id, parent_id = n.values_at(:id, :parent_id)
tree[id][:title] = n[:title]
tree[parent_id][:children].push(tree[id])
end
请注意,节点(包括父节点)是由 tree
的 default_proc
第一次自动创建的,因此节点在<$ c $中的顺序c> arr 无关紧要。
Note that the nodes (including the parent nodes) are automatically created by tree
's default_proc
the first time they're seen so the node order in arr
is irrelevant.
这使我们只剩下 tree
中的树了键是:id
s(包括 nil
键的虚拟根),值是从该点开始的子树
That leaves us with the tree in tree
where the keys are :id
s (including the virtual root at the nil
key) and the values are subtrees from that point.
然后,如果您查看 tree [nil] [:children]
来剥离虚拟根,您'
Then if you look at tree[nil][:children]
to peel off the virtual root, you'll see this:
[
{ :title => "A", :children => [
{ :title => "A1", :children => [
{ :title => "A11", :children => [] },
{ :title => "12", :children => [
{ :title => "A2=121", :children => [] }
] }
] },
{ :title => "A2", :children => [
{ :title => "A21", :children => [] }
] }
] },
{ :title => "B", :children => [
{ :title => "B11", :children => [] },
{ :title => "B12", :children => [] }
] }
]
正在寻找,您应该可以从那里拿走它。这与您的示例响应不匹配,但这是因为您的示例 arr
也没有。
and that has exactly the structure you're looking for and you should be able to take it from there. That doesn't match your sample response but that's because your sample arr
doesn't either.
您还可以说:
tree = arr.each_with_object(Hash.new { |h,k| h[k] = { :title => nil, :children => [ ] } }) do |n, tree|
#...
end
如果您更喜欢嘈杂的第一行到单独的 tree
声明。
if you preferred that rather noisy first line to a separate tree
declaration.
这篇关于红宝石的树形结构,其父级子级为无宝石的数组格式?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!