Poltergeist是否正确支持水豚的Should_not RSpec匹配器？ [英] Does poltergeist support capybara's should_not RSpec matchers correctly?

问题描述

根据水豚的自述文件：

以下两个语句在功能上等效：

The two following statements are functionally equivalent:

page.should_not have_xpath('a')
page.should have_no_xpath('a')

但是，当尝试这种方法时，这似乎并不正确。当使用capybara-webkit时，这似乎很好用：

However, when trying this out, that does not appear to be true. This seems to work fine when using capybara-webkit:

visit dashboard_accounting_reports_path

click_link 'Delete'

page.should_not have_css('#reports .report')

但是使用poltergeist时，通常会失败，这似乎是在使用 #has_css？，实际上并不会等待给定的元素消失：

But when using poltergeist, it often fails with this, which seems to say it's using #has_css? under the covers, which won't actually wait for the given element to disappear:

 Failure/Error: page.should_not have_css('#reports .report')
   expected #has_css?("#reports .report") to return false, got true

如果我将断言更改为这样，似乎每次都成功：

If I change the assertion to read like this instead, it seems to succeed every time:

page.should have_no_css('#reports .report')

我疯了吗，或者这是Poltergeist中的错误吗？我正在使用PhantomJS 1.8.2，poltergeist 1.1.0和capybara 2.0.2。

Am I crazy, or is this a bug in poltergeist? I'm using PhantomJS 1.8.2, poltergeist 1.1.0, and capybara 2.0.2.

这是 should_not have_css <的调试输出/ code>示例： http://pastebin.com/4ZtPEN5B

这是应该有的一个示例： http://pastebin.com/TrtURWcZ

推荐答案

我认为我发现了问题-我一直在要求我的spec_helper.rb中的 capybara / dsl而不是 capybara / rspec，因此该规格中未包含Capybara :: RSpecMatchers发出的正确的 should_not 行为和错误消息

I think I found the problem - I had been requiring 'capybara/dsl' in my spec_helper.rb instead of 'capybara/rspec', so the proper should_not behavior and error messages from Capybara::RSpecMatchers were not included in that spec.

编辑：原来，如果您需要 rspec / rails，它将自动为您带来正确的水豚东西。但是，如果您使用的是一些非标准的RSpec内容，例如在请求规范中使用Capybara，则仍然需要在其中手动添加Capybara :: DSL和Capybara :: RSpecMatchers。另请参阅： https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/ blob / master / Capybara.md

It turns out if you're requiring 'rspec/rails', it will automatically bring in the correct capybara stuff for you. But if you're using some non-standard RSpec stuff, like using Capybara in request specs, you'll still need to manually include Capybara::DSL and Capybara::RSpecMatchers there. See also: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/blob/master/Capybara.md

这篇关于Poltergeist是否正确支持水豚的Should_not RSpec匹配器？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！