缩小jooq选择时避免强制转换 [英] Avoiding casts when narrowing jooq selects

问题描述

假设我有一个图书数据库，我想检查CLRS图书的作者是否正确。

Let's say I have a book database and I want to check whether the CLRS book has the correct authors.

假设 private static final String CLRS_title =算法简介;

    @Test
    public void CLRS_is_written_by_CLRS(){
        //given        
        SelectConditionStep<Record> query = create
                .select()
                    .from(
                            (
                                    BOOK.leftOuterJoin(BOOK_AUTHOR).on(BOOK.ID.eq(BOOK_AUTHOR.BOOKID))
                            ).leftOuterJoin(AUTHOR).on(AUTHOR.ID.eq(BOOK_AUTHOR.AUTHORID))
                    )
                    .where(BOOK.TITLE.eq(CLRS_title))
                ;

        //when
        Result<Record> result = query.fetch();
        List<String> authorNames = result.stream().map(r-> r.getValue(AUTHOR.LASTNAME)).collect(Collectors.toList());

        //then
        assertThat(authorNames.size(),is(4));
        assertThat(authorNames.containsAll(Arrays.asList("Cormen","Leiserson","Rivest","Stein")), is(true));

    }

（请忽略连接整个表的效率很低当我们只对一本书感兴趣时，如有必要，我将对此做一个单独的问题。）

(Please ignore that it's very inefficient to join a whole table when we're just interested in one book, I'll make a separate question about that, if/when necessary.)

我现在只想选择 AUTHOR.LASTNAME 属性而不是所有内容。

I now just want to select the AUTHOR.LASTNAME property instead of just everything.

SelectConditionStep<Record1<String>> query = create
        .select(AUTHOR.LASTNAME.as("AuthorName"))
            .from(
                    (
                            BOOK.leftOuterJoin(BOOK_AUTHOR).on(BOOK.ID.eq(BOOK_AUTHOR.BOOKID))
                    ).leftOuterJoin(AUTHOR).on(AUTHOR.ID.eq(BOOK_AUTHOR.AUTHORID))
            )
            .where(BOOK.TITLE.eq(CLRS_title))
        ;

//when
Result<Record1<String>> result = query.fetch();
List<String> authorNames = result.stream().map(r-> (String)r.getValue("AuthorName")).collect(Collectors.toList());

//then
assertThat(authorNames.size(),is(4));
assertThat(authorNames.containsAll(Arrays.asList("Cormen","Leiserson","Rivest","Stein")), is(true));

在<$中强制转换为 String c $ c> authorNames 是必需的，因为没有它，我将无法编译，因为

the cast to String in the authorNames generation is required because without it, I cannot compile because

不兼容的类型。必需的列表，但将'collect'推断为R：不存在类型变量的实例，因此Object符合String推断变量T具有不兼容的边界：相等约束：字符串下界：Object

Incompatible types. Required List but 'collect' was inferred to R: no instance(s) of type variable(s) exist so that Object conforms to String inference variable T has incompatible bounds: equality constraints: String lower bounds: Object

有没有办法避免这种转换并仍然获得更狭窄的选择？

Is there a way to avoid this cast and still get the more narrow select?

推荐答案

不带别名

我不明白为什么要重命名列。只是...

Without aliasing

I don't see why you rename your column. Just...

.select(AUTHOR.LASTNAME)

然后

List<String> authorNames = result.getValues(AUTHOR.LASTNAME);

带别名

如果必须使用别名，然后它有助于将别名列表达式分配给局部变量：

With aliasing

If you must alias it, then it helps assigning the aliased column expression to a local variable:

Field<String> lastname = AUTHOR.LASTNAME.as("lastname");

// ...
.select(lastname)

...然后：

List<String> authorNames = result.getValues(lastname);

或者，您可以重复两次别名表达式

Alternatively, you can repeat the aliasing expression twice

.select(AUTHOR.LASTNAME.as("lastname"))

...，然后：

List<String> authorNames = result.getValues(AUTHOR.LASTNAME.as("lastname"));

这篇关于缩小jooq选择时避免强制转换的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！