在ClearCase中隐藏元素 [英] Hiding an element in ClearCase

问题描述

我正在尝试在ClearCase视图中隐藏一个元素。我在配置规范中设置了以下行：

I'm trying to hide an element in my ClearCase view. I've set the following line in my config spec:

element /path/to/some/element -none

在我的配置规范中，还有一个包含到另一个配置规范中（依次包含其他配置规范和等等-完全是一团糟，但我无法更改）。我很确定其中还有另一行将这个元素设置为标记版本。当我在文件上执行 ct ls 时，我会看到：

Further down in my config spec, there is an include to another config spec (which in turn includes other config specs and so on - a complete mess, but I can't change this). I'm pretty sure there is another line in there setting this element to a tagged version. When I do ct ls on the file I see:

/path/to/some/element@@/main/1        Rule: SOME_TAG

-none 到 element 的选项可以被标签覆盖吗？如果是这样，我该如何解决呢？

Is the -none option to element overridable by a tag? If so, how can I work around it?

推荐答案

我确认配置规范无法通过符号链接正常运行。

请参见配置规范手册页

I confirm a config spec wouldn't operate well through a symbolic link.
See config spec man page

没有VOB符号链接范围。

一个VOB符号链接在一个或多个版本的目录元素中被分类（列出）

There is no VOB symbolic link scope.
A VOB symbolic link is cataloged (listed) in one or more versions of a directory element

一个Vob符号链接在配置规范中添加了一些问题（例如，在重定位元素后可见）

A vob symbolic link adds some issue with the config spec (seen for instance after relocating elements)

即使不谈论 Vob symlink，此技术说明没有通配符或递归规则不相关的ClearCase配置规范将无法解析符号链接的终点。

Even without talking about Vob symlink, this technote mentions that ClearCase config spec without an unrelated wildcard or unrelated recursive rule will not resolve the end point of a symlink.

这篇关于在ClearCase中隐藏元素的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！