在/ vobs / some / path和/ view / view-tag-name / vobs / some / path中工作 [英] working in /vobs/some/path versus /view/view-tag-name/vobs/some/path

问题描述

我必须在工作中使用ClearCase，基本工作流程要求我做类似的事情：

I have to use ClearCase at work and the basic workflow requires me to do something like:

cleartool setview <view-tag-name>

view-tag-name 是动态的我可能会添加的视图。从我收集的内容中，将打开一个新的外壳，该外壳使我可以访问 / vobs / some / path 中的文件，这些文件通过已安装的MVFS文件系统。但是，在现有Shell之上的第二个Shell破坏了我的Emacs客户端-Emacs守护程序的合作。此外，在另一个SO答案中，有人说他根本不理会 setview ，所以没有访问：

view-tag-name is a dynamic view I might add. From what I've gathered this opens up a new shell that allows me to access files in /vobs/some/path that go through a mounted MVFS file system. However this second shell on top of the existing shell breaks my Emacs client - Emacs daemon cooperation. Moreover, in another SO answer someone was saying that he didn't bother with setview at all and so instead of accessing:

1. / vobs / some / path （来自 setview shell）

1. /vobs/some/path (from within a setview shell)

…他会访问：

… he would access:

1. / view / view-tag-name / vobs / some /路径（不使用 setview shell）

1. /view/view-tag-name/vobs/some/path (without using a setview shell)

我做了一些实验，无论我是否在 / vobs / some / path cleartool 命令的工作方式都相同c $ c>（在 setview shell中）或我是否在 / view / view-tag-name / vobs / some / path （在普通外壳中）。

I've experimented a little and it seems that all cleartool commands work the same way whether I am in /vobs/some/path (in a setview shell) or whether I am in /view/view-tag-name/vobs/some/path (in a plain shell).

所以我的问题是：

1. 在 setview shell中的 / vobs / some / path 中工作与在 / view / view-tag-name / vobs / some / path 放在普通外壳中？


2. 何时使用正确的术语指的是 / view / view-tag-name 目录？


3. 为什么当我执行 ct lsview时- l -properties -ful视图标记名称我看不到对 / view / view-tag-name 目录的引用吗？该目录不是与视图关联的吗？

1. what's the difference between working in /vobs/some/path in a setview shell versus working in /view/view-tag-name/vobs/some/path in a plain shell?
2. what is the proper term to use when referring to the /view/view-tag-name directory?
3. why when I do ct lsview -l -properties -ful view-tag-name I don't see any reference to the /view/view-tag-name directory? Isn't this directory associated with the view?

推荐答案

在 setview shell中的 / vobs / some / path 中工作与在 / view / view-tag-name / vobs / some / path 放在一个普通的外壳中？

what's the difference between working in /vobs/some/path in a setview shell versus working in /view/view-tag-name/vobs/some/path in a plain shell?

不要使用 cleartool setview ：如我之前所述， cleartool setview 命令打开一个子外壳，假定该命令在其中运行可能会有问题。

Do not use cleartool setview: As I explained before, the cleartool setview command opens a subshell in which commands are supposed to be run, which can be problematic.

在 / view / view-tag-name / vobs / some / path 中工作保留在您的主外壳中，及其所有属性。

Working in /view/view-tag-name/vobs/some/path means you remain in your main shell, with all its properties.

对我们来说合适的术语是什么e指的是 / view / view-tag-name 目录？

这引用了完整路径视图的根文件夹（在其中要安装vob并根据视图配置规范及其选择规则来访问版本）

That references the full path view root folder (inside which you are mounting vobs and accessing versions based on the view config spec and its selection rules)

在 / vobs / some / path ，您仍然可以通过cleartool pwv看到您所在的视图（路径工作视图）。

In /vobs/some/path, you can still see the view you are in with cleartool pwv ("path working view").

为什么当我做 ct lsview -l -properties -ful view-tag-name 时，我看不到任何对<$ c的引用$ c> / view / view-tag-name 目录？

why when I do ct lsview -l -properties -ful view-tag-name I don't see any reference to the /view/view-tag-name directory?

您正在看到视图，然后将其安装在 / view / view-tag-name （在Unix上）或 M：\view-tag-name 在Windows上。

这些属性不假定该视图在运行时的使用情况，它们仅显示静态元数据（如视图存储或视图类型）

You are seeing the property of the view, which will then be mounted in /view/view-tag-name (on Unix) or M:\view-tag-name on Windows.
Those properties make no assumption on the runtime usage of that view, they only display static metadata (like the view storage or the view type)

这篇关于在/ vobs / some / path和/ view / view-tag-name / vobs / some / path中工作的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！