与`cleartool lsco -graphical`相比，`cleartool lsco -r -cvi -me`非常慢。有可能提高其性能吗？ [英] `cleartool lsco -r -cvi -me` is extremely slow compared to `cleartool lsco -graphical`. Is it possible to improve it's performance?

问题描述

我希望能够在命令行上使用lsco更好地与Emacs集成，但是运行速度却非常慢！

I'd like to be able to utilize lsco on the command line for better integration with Emacs, but it runs prohibitively slowly!

通常，GUI较慢！

推荐答案

摘自技术说明 递归检出和检入元素：

建议如果由于此递归操作（更改操作（例如以较小的块签出/签入）或一起停止操作）而导致性能降低。

It is recommended that if performance is degraded due to this recursive operation that either the operation be changed (say to checkout/checkin in smaller chunks) or to stop the operation all together.

换句话说，lsco（和相关命令）的递归性质不能很好地扩展。

与GUI相反，GUI可能很好地为每个涉及的主目录启动多个请求。

In other words, the recursive nature of lsco (and associated commands) doesn't scale well.
As opposed to the GUI, which might very well launch several request per main directories involved.

这篇关于与`cleartool lsco -graphical`相比，`cleartool lsco -r -cvi -me`非常慢。有可能提高其性能吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！