无状态会话bean可以保护最终方法吗? [英] Can a stateless session bean have protected final method?

查看:88
本文介绍了无状态会话bean可以保护最终方法吗?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我已经定义了一个会话bean基类。此类是抽象的,包含受保护的final方法。会话实现类扩展了抽象类并定义了其他方法。在部署期间,Glassfish 3.1.2服务器会生成一个异常,指出该方法已被覆盖。

I have defined a session bean base class. This class is abstract and contains protected final methods. A session implementation class extends the abstract class and defines additional methods. During deployment, Glassfish 3.1.2 server generates an exception stating that method is overridden.

abstract class AbstractSessionBean {
    @PersistenceContext(unitName="primary")
    private EntityManager em;

    protected final EntityManager getEntityManager() {
       return em;
    }
}

@Startup
@Stateless
class RegistrationSessionBean extends AbstractSessionBean {
     public void loadRegistration() {
        ...
     }
}

在部署过程中,glassfish服务器引发异常。如果我将AbstractSessionBean的方法设为非最终方法,则部署成功。

During deployment, the glassfish server throws an exception. If I make methods of AbstractSessionBean non-final, deployment is successful.

这是否意味着会话bean不能具有最终方法?还是此行为仅适用于Glassfish 3.1.2。

Does this mean that session bean cannot have final methods? or is this behavior specific to Glassfish 3.1.2 only.

异常消息为:

[#|2013-08-26T17:45:48.542+0530|SEVERE|glassfish3.1.2|javax.enterprise.system.tools.admin.org.glassfish.deployment.admin|_ThreadID=47;_ThreadName=Thread-2;|Exception while loading the app : EJB Container initialization error
java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not invoke defineClass!
    at com.sun.ejb.containers.EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.makeClass(EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.java:448)
    at com.sun.ejb.containers.EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.access$200(EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.java:64)
    at com.sun.ejb.containers.EjbOptionalIntfGenerator$1.run(EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.java:99)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at com.sun.ejb.containers.EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.loadClass(EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.java:96)
    at com.sun.ejb.containers.BaseContainer.instantiateOptionalEJBLocalBusinessObjectImpl(BaseContainer.java:3886)
    at com.sun.ejb.containers.StatelessSessionContainer.initializeHome(StatelessSessionContainer.java:253)
    at com.sun.ejb.containers.ContainerFactoryImpl.createContainer(ContainerFactoryImpl.java:167)
    at org.glassfish.ejb.startup.EjbApplication.loadContainers(EjbApplication.java:230)
    at org.glassfish.ejb.startup.EjbDeployer.load(EjbDeployer.java:305)
    at org.glassfish.ejb.startup.EjbDeployer.load(EjbDeployer.java:108)
    at org.glassfish.internal.data.ModuleInfo.load(ModuleInfo.java:186)
    at org.glassfish.internal.data.ApplicationInfo.load(ApplicationInfo.java:264)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.server.ApplicationLifecycle.deploy(ApplicationLifecycle.java:460)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.server.ApplicationLifecycle.deploy(ApplicationLifecycle.java:240)
    at org.glassfish.deployment.admin.DeployCommand.execute(DeployCommand.java:389)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.CommandRunnerImpl$1.execute(CommandRunnerImpl.java:348)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.CommandRunnerImpl.doCommand(CommandRunnerImpl.java:363)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.CommandRunnerImpl.doCommand(CommandRunnerImpl.java:1085)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.CommandRunnerImpl.access$1200(CommandRunnerImpl.java:95)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.CommandRunnerImpl$ExecutionContext.execute(CommandRunnerImpl.java:1291)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.CommandRunnerImpl$ExecutionContext.execute(CommandRunnerImpl.java:1259)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.AdminAdapter.doCommand(AdminAdapter.java:461)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.AdminAdapter.service(AdminAdapter.java:212)
    at com.sun.grizzly.tcp.http11.GrizzlyAdapter.service(GrizzlyAdapter.java:179)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.server.HK2Dispatcher.dispath(HK2Dispatcher.java:117)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.services.impl.ContainerMapper$Hk2DispatcherCallable.call(ContainerMapper.java:354)
    at com.sun.enterprise.v3.services.impl.ContainerMapper.service(ContainerMapper.java:195)
    at com.sun.grizzly.http.ProcessorTask.invokeAdapter(ProcessorTask.java:860)
    at com.sun.grizzly.http.ProcessorTask.doProcess(ProcessorTask.java:757)
    at com.sun.grizzly.http.ProcessorTask.process(ProcessorTask.java:1056)
    at com.sun.grizzly.http.DefaultProtocolFilter.execute(DefaultProtocolFilter.java:229)
    at com.sun.grizzly.DefaultProtocolChain.executeProtocolFilter(DefaultProtocolChain.java:137)
    at com.sun.grizzly.DefaultProtocolChain.execute(DefaultProtocolChain.java:104)
    at com.sun.grizzly.DefaultProtocolChain.execute(DefaultProtocolChain.java:90)
    at com.sun.grizzly.http.HttpProtocolChain.execute(HttpProtocolChain.java:79)
    at com.sun.grizzly.ProtocolChainContextTask.doCall(ProtocolChainContextTask.java:54)
    at com.sun.grizzly.SelectionKeyContextTask.call(SelectionKeyContextTask.java:59)
    at com.sun.grizzly.ContextTask.run(ContextTask.java:71)
    at com.sun.grizzly.util.AbstractThreadPool$Worker.doWork(AbstractThreadPool.java:532)
    at com.sun.grizzly.util.AbstractThreadPool$Worker.run(AbstractThreadPool.java:513)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor50.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
    at com.sun.ejb.containers.EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.makeClass(EjbOptionalIntfGenerator.java:445)
    ... 41 more
Caused by: java.lang.VerifyError: class org.bean.test.persistence.util.__EJB31_Generated__RegistrationSessionBean__Intf____Bean__ overrides final method getContext.()Ljavax/ejb/SessionContext;
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:792)
    ... 45 more
|#]


推荐答案

简短的回答是是,但是长答案是一般是,但使用无接口视图时则否。无接口视图的限制间接来自EJB 3.2规范的3.4.4节:

The short answer is "yes", but the long answer is "yes in general, but no when using no-interface view". The restriction for no-interface view comes indirectly from section 3.4.4 of the EJB 3.2 specification:


仅bean类的公共方法和
java.lang.Object以外的任何超类中的任何一个都可以通过无接口视图来调用。
通过
尝试使用任何其他访问修饰符调用无接口视图引用的方法,必须导致
javax.ejb.EJBException。

Only public methods of the bean class and of any superclasses except java.lang.Object may be invoked through the no-interface view. Attempted invocations of methods with any other access modifiers via the no-interface view reference must result in the javax.ejb.EJBException.

生成无接口视图代理时,EJB容器必须创建EJB类的子类并覆盖所有公共方法以提供代理行为。但是,上面引用的规范中的第二句话意味着,还必须重写所有剩余的非私有方法,以引发无条件的EJBException。也就是说,来自应用程序服务器的错误消息可能会更好。

When generating a no-interface view proxy, the EJB container must create a subclass of the EJB class and override all public methods to provide proxying behavior. However, the second sentence from the specification quote above implies that all remaining non-private methods must also be overridden in order to throw an unconditional EJBException. That said, the error message from the application server could be better.

这篇关于无状态会话bean可以保护最终方法吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆