GWT请求工厂-从"ServiceLayerDecorator.isLive()"收集的多个查询; - 方法 [英] GWT Request Factory - Multiple queries for collection from the "ServiceLayerDecorator.isLive()" - method
问题描述
我遇到的问题是,每次我从gwt请求工厂检索一个集合时,都会对该集合中的每个实体调用"findEntity()"方法.这种"findEntity()"方法称为SQL数据库.
我发现发生这种情况是因为请求工厂检查了"ServiceLayerDecorator.isLive()"方法中每个实体的活动性"(也在此处进行了描述:解决方案
RequestFactory期望每个请求的会话模式具有 session ,以保证每个实体有一个实例(即使用缓存).
正确的 fix 是让isLive
命中该缓存,而不是数据库.如果您使用JPA或JDO,他们应该免费为您这样做.重要的是请求"对此有何想法(如果发出了删除请求,则isLive
应该返回false
),而不是真正考虑了数据库中存储的内容,还要考虑其他因素用户可以同时完成.
话虽这么说,isLive
仅用于驱动客户端的EntityProxyChange
事件,所以,如果您不使用它们,那么像您一样无条件地返回true
不会造成任何问题. /p>
I had the problem, that every time i retrieved a collection from the gwt request factory, there was the "findEntity()"-method called for every entity in that collection. And this "findEntity()"-method calls the SQL-Database.
I found out that this happens because request factory checks the "liveness" of every entity in the "ServiceLayerDecorator.isLive()"-method (also described here: requestfactory and findEntity method in GWT)
So i provided my own RequestFactoryServlet:
public class MyCustomRequestFactoryServlet extends RequestFactoryServlet {
public MyCustomRequestFactoryServlet() {
super(new DefaultExceptionHandler(), new MyCustomServiceLayerDecorator());
}
}
And my own ServiceLayerDecorator:
public class MyCustomServiceLayerDecorator extends ServiceLayerDecorator {
/**
* This check does normally a lookup against the db for every element in a collection
* -> Therefore overridden
*/
@Override
public boolean isLive(Object domainObject) {
return true;
}
}
This works so far and I don't get this massive amount of queries against the database.
Now I am wondering if I will get some other issues with that? Or is there a better way to solve this?
RequestFactory expects a session-per-request pattern with the session guaranteeing a single instance per entity (i.e. using a cache).
The proper fix is to have isLive
hit that cache, not the database. If you use JPA or JDO, they should do that for you for free. What matters is what "the request" thinks about it (if you issued a delete request, isLive
should return false
), not really what's exactly stored in the DB, taking into account what other users could have done concurrently.
That being said, isLive
is only used for driving EntityProxyChange
events on the client side, so if you don't use them, it shouldn't cause any problem unconditionally returning true
like you do.
这篇关于GWT请求工厂-从"ServiceLayerDecorator.isLive()"收集的多个查询; - 方法的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!