仅提供压缩文件-一个好主意? [英] serving gziped files only - a good idea?

问题描述

我有一个提供小部件的Web服务.为了实现可伸缩性，我想在Amazon S3上保留js文件的压缩版本.事实是，无法接受压缩文件的浏览器将无法使用.

I have a web service that serves widgets. For scalability sake I want to keep gzipped versions of the js files on Amazon S3. The thing is that browswers not able to accept gzipped files will not be served.

谁知道我在哪里可以找到统计信息，以了解将不为多少潜在用户提供服务?总的来说这是个好主意吗?

Anyone know where I can find statistics to know how many of the potential users will not be served? Is it a good idea in general?

推荐答案

从mod_gzip页面.其中列出了哪些浏览器支持哪些浏览器.

See this page from the mod_gzip pages. It has a breakdown of which browsers support what.

这篇关于仅提供压缩文件-一个好主意?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！