处理异常时,保存不起作用 [英] Saving does not work when exception is handled
问题描述
我正面临着无法找到调试方法的情况.
I'm facing a situation I can't even find a way to debug.
我有以下spring-data
存储库:
IntegrationLogRepository
public interface IntegrationLogRepository extends PagingAndSortingRepository<IntegrationLog, Long> {
}
FooRepository
public interface FooRepository extends PagingAndSortingRepository<Foo, Long> {
}
在我的业务逻辑上,我有如下内容:
And on my business logic I have something like the following:
IntegrationLog log = new IntegrationLog();
log.setTimestamp(new Date());
try {
Foo foo = new Foo();
// Build the Foo object...
fooRepository.save(foo);
log.setStatus("OK");
} catch (Exception e) {
log.setStatus("NOK");
} finally {
integrationLogRepository.save(log);
}
当集成运行良好时,log
会保存为OK
状态.一切都好.但是当我遇到异常时,出于某些原因integrationLogRepository.save(log)
不会执行任何操作.我什么也没什么意思:没有引发异常,并且我看不到任何在WebLogic控制台上执行的休眠查询.日志不持久...
When the integrations runs fine, the log
is saved with the OK
status. Everything is fine. But when I have an exception, for some reason integrationLogRepository.save(log)
doesn't do nothing. I mean nothing NOTHING: No exception is thrown and I can't see any hibernate query being executed on my WebLogic console. The log is not persisted...
为什么会这样?
以下是我的依赖项:
compile 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-rest'
compile 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-security'
compile "org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web-services"
runtime 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-devtools'
compile 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-jpa'
compile "org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-websocket"
compile 'javax.servlet:javax.servlet-api:3.1.0'
compile 'org.hibernate:hibernate-core:5.1.16.Final'
compile 'org.hibernate:hibernate-validator:5.2.3.Final'
compile 'org.hibernate:hibernate-entitymanager:5.1.0.Final'
在Spring Boot 1.5.15.RELEASE
,Java 1.7
和WebLogic 12.1.3
上运行.
Running on Spring Boot 1.5.15.RELEASE
, Java 1.7
and WebLogic 12.1.3
.
谢谢!
推荐答案
引发的异常也回滚了集成日志保存. 如果要保存日志,则保存时必须给它单独进行事务处理.
The exception that was thrown is also rolling back the integration log save. If you want to have the log saved, you have to give it a separate transaction when saving.
将日志存储库抽象到服务,并在保存日志的服务方法上添加创建新事务的事务.
Abstract the log repository to a service and on the service method that saves the log add the transaction that creates a new transaction.
@Service
public class IntegrationLogService {
private final IntegrationLogRepository logRepository;
@Autowired
public IntegrationLogService(IntegrationLogRepository logRepository) {
this.logRepository = logRepository;
}
@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void save(Log log) {
this.logRepository.save(log);
}
}
在您的企业中替换
finally {
integrationLogRepository.save(log);
}
使用
finally {
integrationLogService.save(log);
}
修改
为什么在业务层上设置@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.NOT_SUPPORTED)
起作用?
Why setting @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.NOT_SUPPORTED)
on the business layer worked?
要了解其工作原理,我们首先需要看一下在春季使用org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository
的存储库中调用save
时会发生什么.
To understand why it worked, we need to first look at what happens when one calls save
on a repository in spring that uses org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository
.
Spring尝试确定方法和targetClass上的TransactionAttribute
.简而言之,对于方法save
和类CrudRepository
,它没有找到任何东西. Spring使用SimpleJpaRepository
作为CrudRepository
的默认实现,如果未在您的属性中找到任何事务属性,它将使用SimpleJpaRepository
中指定的事务属性.
Spring tries to determine the TransactionAttribute
's on the method and targetClass. For the method save
and class CrudRepository
, in short it did not find any. Spring uses SimpleJpaRepository
as the default implementation of the CrudRepository
, if it did not find any transactional attributes on yours it will use the one specified in SimpleJpaRepository
.
@Transactional
public <S extends T> S save(S entity)
@Transactional
上的默认传播是必需的.
The default propagation on @Transactional
is required.
Propagation propagation() default Propagation.REQUIRED;
支持当前交易,如果不存在则创建一个新交易.
Support a current transaction, create a new one if none exists.
从上面的文档中可以看到,如果未指定任何事务,它将创建一个新事务.因此,当您将业务层上的事务设置为NOT_SUPPORTED
(以非事务方式执行)时,实际的CrudRepository
确实创建了它自己的事务,这意味着回滚不会影响它.
As you can see from the documentation above, if no transaction is specified it will create a new one. So when you set the transaction on the business layer to NOT_SUPPORTED
(Execute non-transactionally), the actual CrudRepository
did create it's own transaction which means the rollback would not affect it.
这篇关于处理异常时,保存不起作用的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!