Windows系统：XAMPP VS WampServer VS VS的EasyPHP替代 [英] Windows: XAMPP vs WampServer vs EasyPHP vs alternative

问题描述

有一个类似的问题，三年前在这里问过，但我想进一步打开它包括所有可能的Windows /阿帕奇/ MySQL的/ PHP堆栈。

There was a similar question asked here three years ago, but I want to open it up further to include all possible Windows/Apache/MySQL/PHP stacks.

这在你认为是最好的？

XAMPP 似乎是最流行的，但我已经读到了好不好的东西，让我怀疑这是因为它的普及意味着好。比如，我听说他们默认的PHP配置是非常不安全的（显然没有被留下这些孔打开他们的管理应用无法运行）。这并不可怕的发展情况来看，很明显，但你可能最终依靠像的register_globals 。

XAMPP seems to be the most popular, but I've read several bad things about it that make me wonder if it's as good as its popularity suggests. For example, I've heard that their default PHP configuration is very insecure (and apparently their admin app can't function without these holes being left open). This isn't terrible for a development situation, obviously, but you may end up relying on something like register_globals.

我也发现了别的东西令我关注：开发商建议Vista用户才能使用他们的软件禁用UAC！

I also spotted something else which makes me concerned: The developers recommend that Vista users disable UAC in order to use their software!

对于我来说，这是一个大红旗。是的，有与越来越像在Vista上运行此启用UAC，但禁用UAC不应该提供一个解决方案，尤其是对newbs（谁需要UAC比任何人）的问题。这让我很担心。

For me that's a big red flag. Yes, there are problems with getting something like this running on Vista with UAC enabled, but disabling UAC should never be offered as a solution, especially for newbs (who need UAC more than anyone). It makes me very concerned.

WampServer 显然是比较容易切换PHP或Apache的版本中，如果你需要。但它带来了比XAMPP功能少（没有FTP服务器，例如）。

WampServer apparently is easier to switch versions of PHP or Apache, if you need to. But it comes with less features than XAMPP (no FTP server, for example).

的EasyPHP 是一个我没有经验，所以我不能说，但它显然是pretty受欢迎。

EasyPHP is one that I have no experience of, so I can't say, but it's apparently pretty popular, too.

的替代品？有一吨在维基百科列出的其他栈的。做这些来推荐？

Alternatives? There a ton of other stacks listed on Wikipedia. Do any of these come recommended?

那么，哪你使用，为什么你认为这是最好的？你刚才跟你尝试过的第一个坚守？

So which do you use, and why do you consider it the best? Did you just stick with the first one you tried?

我想我们大多数人只是想要的东西快，重量轻，和及时更新。

I imagine most of us just want something quick, light, and up-to-date.

推荐答案

我一般安装Apache + PHP + MySQL的通过手，不使用任何包像那些你在说什么。

I generally install Apache + PHP + MySQL by-hand, not using any package like those you're talking about.

这是一个有点更多的工作，是的;但知道如何安装和配置环境是伟大的 - 和有益

It's a bit more work, yes; but knowing how to install and configure your environment is great -- and useful.

第一次，你需要也许半天或一天，以配置这些。但是，至少，你会知道怎么做。

The first time, you'll need maybe half a day or a day to configure those. But, at least, you'll know how to do so.

和接下来的时间，事情会更容易，你需要更少的时间。

And the next times, things will be far more easy, and you'll need less time.

否则，你可能想看看 Zend服务器 - 这是另一个软件包捆绑的Apache + PHP + MySQL的

Else, you might want to take a look at Zend Server -- which is another package that bundles Apache + PHP + MySQL.

或者，作为替代，不使用Windows。

Or, as an alternative, don't use Windows.

如果您的生产服务器运行的是Linux，为什么不能在开发机器上运行Linux？

If your production servers are running Linux, why not run Linux on your development machine?

如果你不希望的（或不能）的计算机上安装Linux，使用虚拟机。

And if you don't want to (or cannot) install Linux on your computer, use a Virtual Machine.

这篇关于Windows系统：XAMPP VS WampServer VS VS的EasyPHP替代的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！