互斥财产组 [英] Mutually exclusive property groups

查看:47
本文介绍了互斥财产组的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

假设我有一个具有四个可能属性的对象:a,b,c,d. a和b只能一起出现(即,当且仅当b出现时,a才出现).如果出现a和b,则不会出现c (也就是说,a/b和c是互斥的).如果没有出现a和b,则c可能会出现(但不是必需的). d可以与a/b,c任意组合出现,也可以单独出现.除了a,b,c或d之外,没有其他属性.

Suppose I have an object with four possible properties: a, b, c, d. a and b can only appear together (i.e., a appears if and only if b appears). If a and b appear, c cannot appear (that is, a/b and c are mutually exclusive). If a and b do not appear, c may appear (but is not required to). d can appear in any combination with a/b, c, or on its own. No properties other than a, b, c, or d may appear at all.

如何将其表示为jsonschema?我怀疑我可以使用oneOfrequired的某种组合,但是我找不到正确的咒语.

How do I express this as a jsonschema? I suspect I could use some combination of oneOf and required, but I can't figure out the proper incantation.

推荐答案

您可以将约束表达为:

  • 两个:"a""b"都存在,而"c"不存在
  • 或:"a""b"都不存在. ("c"可能存在或可能不存在)
  • either: both "a" and "b" are present, and "c" is not present
  • or: neither "a" nor "b" is present. ("c" may or may not be present)

在第二点说都不"有点冗长.在这里,我们用allOf/not表示了它. (注意:您不能在这里将它们放在单个required子句中,因为您需要为每个单独的not.)

Saying "neither" in the second point is a bit verbose. Here, we've expressed it using allOf/not. (Note: you can't factor them into a single required clause here, because you need a separate not for each one.)

{
    "oneOf": [
        {
            "required": ["a", "b"],
            "not": {"required": ["c"]}
        },
        {
            "allOf": [
                {
                    "not": {"required": ["a"]}
                },
                {
                    "not": {"required": ["b"]}
                }
            ]
        }
    ]
}

替代结构

还有另一种说法都不做",实际上是再次使用oneOf.由于必须通过子句的完全是,因此,如果其中一项是{}(通过所有内容),则所有其他选项都将被禁止.

There's also another way to say "neither", which is actually to use oneOf again. Since you must pass exactly one of a oneOf clause, if one of the entries is {} (passes everything), then all the other options are banned.

虽然简洁一些,但阅读起来可能不太直观:

While it's slightly more concise, it's possibly slightly less intuitive to read:

{
    "oneOf": [
        {
            "required": ["a", "b"],
            "not": {"required": ["c"]}
        },
        {
            "oneOf": [
                {},
                {"required": ["a"]},
                {"required": ["b"]}
            ]
        }
    ]
}

这篇关于互斥财产组的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆