R CMD检查结果中未显示警告:1个警告还是0个警告? [英] A warning which doesn't show up in the R CMD check results: 1 warning or 0 warnings?

问题描述

我正在Windows 10下使用RStudio 1.0.136构建R软件包，并收到有关 qpdf 的警告(请参阅

I'm building an R package under Windows 10 with RStudio 1.0.136 and get a warning about qpdf (see How to build qpdf on Windows? for more details about this issue). But and the end of the checks, the number of warnings is shown to be 0. So I wonder if there is one or no warning that has to be solved before I can submit the package to CRAN?

这是检查的最后一部分:

Here is the last part of the checks:

...

• 在示例中检查未声明的依赖项...确定警告检查PDF尺寸减小时需要'qpdf'
• 从"inst/doc"中检查已安装的文件...确定
• 在小插图"中检查文件...确定
• 检查示例...确定
• 在小插曲中检查未声明的依赖项...确定
• 在"inst/doc"中检查程序包渐晕...确定
• 检查小插图输出的重新构建...确定
• 完成状态:1警告

请参阅'C:/用户/用户名/文档/hmi.Rcheck/00check.log'有关详细信息.

See 'C:/Users/username/Documents/hmi.Rcheck/00check.log' for details.

R CMD检查结果0个错误|0警告|0个笔记

R CMD check results 0 errors | 0 warnings | 0 notes

R CMD检查成功

推荐答案

感谢@Benjamin的评论，我已将 .tar.gz 文件上传到

Thanks to the comment from @Benjamin, I've uploaded my .tar.gz-file to the win-builder (with this nice upload-tool). The 00check.log-file now says

...

• 在示例中检查未声明的依赖项...确定
• 从"inst/doc"中检查已安装的文件...确定

...

所以我的问题的答案是，关于qpdf的警告显然可以忽略.

So the answer to my question is, that the warning about qpdf apparently can be ignored.

我得到的唯一注释是(在这里我匿名输入了我的姓名和电子邮件地址):

The only NOTE I get is (here I've anonymised my name and email-adress) :

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'My Name <[e-mail]>'

这似乎是一个可忽略的问题(检查CRAN传入的可行性...注意维护者).

And this seems to be an ignorable issue (checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer).

这篇关于R CMD检查结果中未显示警告:1个警告还是0个警告?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！