为什么在解析此DDL时出错,为什么引擎不能更具体地定位它? [英] Why is there an err parsing this DDL, and why can't the engine be more specific about locating it?

查看:57
本文介绍了为什么在解析此DDL时出错,为什么引擎不能更具体地定位它?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

使用此DDL("BLA"是表名,格式为"CCR130329093342")

With this DDL ("BLA" is a tablename in the form "CCR130329093342")

ALTER TABLE BLA ADD salvation float NOT NULL WITH DEFAULT

...我得到,"解析查询时出错.[令牌行号,令牌行偏移量,令牌错误,] "

...I'm getting, "There was an error parsing the query. [Token line number, Token line offset,, Token in error,,]"

那么,那是哪个行号?抵消?它知道/认为存在问题,但无法或不会说出什么或在哪里.

Okay, then, which line number? offset? It knows/thinks there's a problem, but can't or won't say what or where.

此DDL明显有什么问题吗?应该是这样吗?

Is there anything obviously wrong with this DDL? Should it be this instead:

ALTER TABLE BLA ADD salvation float NOT NULL WITH DEFAULT 0.0

?

如果我将DDL恢复为原始的简单类型(不添加"NOT NULL",则简单地"alter bla add blah nvarchar(12)"),我不会收到无法解析查询"的消息.msg 除了中声明了浮点数的代码(如上所示)...对浮点数有SQL-Server-CE讨厌,或者... ???

If I revert the DDL back to the original simple type (without adding "NOT NULL", simply "alter bla add blah nvarchar(12)" I don't get the "query could not be parsed" msg except in the one that declares a float (shown above)...does SQL-Server-CE hate on floats, or...???

推荐答案

默认值需要一个值:

alter table bla add salvation float not null with default(0.0)

这篇关于为什么在解析此DDL时出错,为什么引擎不能更具体地定位它?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆