Google为什么为本机应用程序提供客户端密码? [英] Why does Google provide a client secret for a Native application?

查看:53
本文介绍了Google为什么为本机应用程序提供客户端密码?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在编写与Google API兼容的本机应用程序.注册我的应用程序后,尽管其明确指定为本机",但Google Developers Console仍向我提供了一个客户端机密.

I'm writing a native application that works against a Google API. Upon registering my application, and despite its explicit designation as Native, the Google Developers Console provides me with a client secret.

据我了解OAuth 2.0协议,本机应用程序永远不应具有客户端机密,因为它们不能保证其机密性.Google是否错误地实施了OAuth 2.0?我应该如何进行?

As far as I understand the OAuth 2.0 protocol, native apps should never have a client secret, since they cannot guarantee its secrecy. Is Google mistaken in its implementation of OAuth 2.0? How should I proceed?

推荐答案

您是正确的,从机密性的角度来看,客户端机密在本机应用程序中并不是非常有用.我怀疑它的存在主要是为了与Web应用程序流程保持一致.

You are correct, the client secret isn't terribly useful in a native application from a being kept secret perspective. I suspect it's there mainly for consistency with the web application flow.

但是它确实至少具有1个有用的功能...原始开发人员可以随时重置它,从而有效地吊销绑定到该客户端ID的所有刷新令牌.

It does however have at least 1 useful feature... the original developer can reset it at any time, effectively revoking all refresh tokens bound to that client ID.

这篇关于Google为什么为本机应用程序提供客户端密码?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆