为什么此Scala代码的编译错误类型不匹配 [英] Why this scala code has a compilation error type mismatch
本文介绍了为什么此Scala代码的编译错误类型不匹配的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
为什么使用此scala代码
Why this scala code
case class Foo[T]() {
def bar(tt: T): Unit = ???
def bar_(s: String)(implicit ev : T =:= String): Unit = bar(s)
}
触发此编译错误
[error] type mismatch;
[error] found : s.type (with underlying type String)
[error] required: T
[error] def foo2(s: String)(implicit ev: T =:= String) = foo(s)
推荐答案
问题是您需要证据 String =:= T
而不是 T =:= String
The thing is that you need evidence String =:= T
rather than T =:= String
.
case class Foo[T]() {
def bar(tt: T): Unit = ???
def bar_(s: String)(implicit ev : String =:= T): Unit = bar(s)
}
=:=
不对称.
https://typelevel.org/blog/2014/07/02/type_equality_to_leibniz.html
另请参见 cats.evidence.Is
, scalaz.Leibniz
.
在scala 2.13中,您也可以这样做
In scala 2.13 you can also do
def bar_(s: String)(implicit ev : T =:= String): Unit = {
implicit val ev1 = ev.flip
bar(s)
}
这篇关于为什么此Scala代码的编译错误类型不匹配的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文