使用Mockito匹配特定类型的空列表 [英] Use Mockito to match a null list of a specific type

问题描述

我有一个需要几个参数的方法.其中之一是某个类的列表，并且null是此参数可接受的值.

I have a method that takes a few parameters. One of them is a List of some class, and null is an acceptable value for this parameter.

public void doStuff(String string, @Nullable List<SomeClass> list) {
    ...
}

我想编写一个使用Mockito的测试，以验证是否以null作为参数调用了该方法.我尝试使用 isNull(List.class):

I want to write a test that uses Mockito to verify the method was called with null as a parameter. I tried using isNull(List.class):

MyClass myClass = ...
verify(myClass).doStuff(any(String.class), isNull(List.class));

但这会产生警告:

未经检查的转换
是必需的:java.util.List<com.package.SomeClass>
找到:java.util.List

unchecked conversion
required: java.util.List< com.package.SomeClass>
found: java.util.List

如果列表不为空，我可以查看如何解决此警告:

I can see how to fix this warning in the event that the list is not null:

// this generates the same warning
verify(myClass).doStuff(any(String.class), any(List.class));

// this does not generate the warning
verify(myClass).doStuff(any(String.class), Matchers.anyListOf(SomeClass.class)));

但是，我似乎找不到一种将这两种方法结合在一起的方法.或者找到一种替代方法来完成我要尝试的工作.(除了通过注释禁止显示警告之外

However, I can't seem to find a way to combine these two approaches together. Or find an alternate approach that accomplishes what I am trying to do. (Other than suppressing the warning with an annotation)

推荐答案

通常的答案是使用显式的泛型方法参数.

The general answer is to use an explicit generic method argument.

verify(myClass).doStuff(any(String.class), Matchers.<List<SomeClass>>isNull());

其他说明:

• 在实践中，警告并不能保护您免受任何伤害； null 是 null ，并且通过类型擦除，所有这些形式无论如何都将编译为相同的字节码.
• Java 8可以从方法参数中推断出泛型类型，因此 isNull()在那里足够聪明而没有智能.
• Mockito 1.x调用类 org.mockito.Matchers ，而Mockito 2.x弃用该类，而推荐使用 org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers .在这两种情况下，匹配器方法都可以通过 org.mockito.Mockito 看到，但是静态继承方法在语义上很弱，并且可能导致这些方法无法在IDE中显示.

• 如果没有作为静态参数，就无法指定< List< SomeClass>> isNull().如果您需要做很多事，您可以要做的就是提取一个本地静态方法...

• In practice, the warning isn't protecting you from anything; null is null, and with type erasure all of these forms will compile to the same bytecode anyway.
• Java 8 can infer generic types from method arguments, so isNull() is sufficient there without cleverness.
• Mockito 1.x calls the class org.mockito.Matchers whereas Mockito 2.x deprecates that class in favor of org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers. In both cases the matcher methods are visible through org.mockito.Mockito, but static-methods-via-inheritance is semantically weak and can cause those methods not to show up in IDEs.

• There's no way to specify <List<SomeClass>>isNull() without the Matchers as a static argument. What you can do, if you need to do this a lot, is to extract a local static method...

private static List<SomeClass> nullSomeClassList() {
  return isNull();  // Return value types can be inferred before Java 8.
}

// elsewhere
verify(myClass).doStuff(any(String.class), nullSomeClassList());

...但是无论您做什么，请不要提取到字段中.副作用在这里很重要.

...but whatever you do, don't extract to a field instead. The side effects are what matters here.

这篇关于使用Mockito匹配特定类型的空列表的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！