谷歌地球 - 富客户端或富互联网架构？ [英] Google Earth - Rich Client or Rich Internet Architecture?
问题描述
Is Google Earth a Thick Client (Rich Client) application or a Rich Internet Application? If you read the Microsoft Architecture Guide 2.0, they seem to thing GE is a Thick Client, along with any application which is not rendered in a web browser, or on a mobile device?
我认为GE是一个RIA的一个很好的例子，加上微软的虚拟地球（VE） （现在的Bing Maps）。 GE是不是在浏览器中呈现的事实不应该成为不使它成为一个RIA决定性的特点。否则胖客户端架构只是有一个人打扫太多了。
I think GE is a perfect example of a RIA, together with Microsoft's Virtual Earth (VE) (Now Bing Maps). The fact that GE is not rendered in a browser shouldn't be the defining characteristic for not making it an RIA. Otherwise the Thick Client Architecture just has to sweep up too much.
给我你的意见，告诉我你为什么这么说。
Give me your opinions and tell me why you say so.
的参见：<一href=\"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1345677/should-rich-client-arch-be-used-in-multi-tier-enterprise-systems\">Should富客户端门多企业级系统中使用 的
推荐答案
我想有没有真正回答这个呢。所有的研究我也做点这样的事实，该行业还没有完全做出了它的头脑，以什么的RIA的。
I guess there is no real answer to this yet. All the research I have done points to the fact the industry has not fully made up its minds as to what an RIA is.
微软相信客户端必须是基于浏览器，而Java社区仍然困惑;-)的JavaPosse了关于这一事项在这个情节很好的治疗。从 jamesh
Microsoft believes the client side must be browser based, while the java community is still confused ;-) "The JavaPosse had a very good treatment on this subject in this episode." from jamesh
实际上，我认为这个问题最好的解决办法是，不仅严格地专注于一个架构来解决特定的问题：
Effectively, I think the best solution to the problem would be to not only focus strictly on one architecture to solve a particular problem:
谷歌地球实际上是一个RIA的实施与富客户端＆LT; - 如果让任何意义
Google Earth is effectively an "RIA" implementation with a "Rich Client". <- If that makes any sense.
如果任何人有异议，或有其他意见，请让我知道，否则这将是我要坚持使用（主要是因为它使得最感觉在我心中的想法，对于现在...; - ）
If anyone disagrees or has other opinions, please let me know, otherwise this would be the thinking I am going to stick with (mostly because it makes the "most" sense in my mind, for now... ;-)
更新：看下面的图片，而忽略了我们对事物的定义，就像移动架构，剩下的，只有专注于RIA，做这个图通过的马克Domenig 更有意义（或至少代替RIA更好）？
Update: Looking at the image below, and ignoring our definition of things like the Mobile architecture and the rest, and focusing only on RIA, does this diagram inspired by an article by Marc Domenig make more sense (or at least place an RIA better)?
这篇关于谷歌地球 - 富客户端或富互联网架构？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
