不应该C＃4.0的新＆QUOT;命名参数＆QUOT;功能被称为＆QUOT;命名参数＆QUOT;？ [英] Shouldn't C# 4.0's new "named parameters" feature be called "named arguments"?

问题描述

我想有可能是这个命名历史原因和其他语言也有类似的功能，但它也似乎我的参数一直在C＃中的名称。参数是无名的。或者是有为什么选择这个术语一个特别的原因？

I suppose there could be historical reasons for this naming and that other languages have similar feature, but it also seems to me that parameters always had a name in C#. Arguments are the unnamed ones. Or is there a particular reason why this terminology was chosen?

推荐答案

是的，你是绝对正确的（在我看来，反正）。讽刺的是，虽然我平时挑剔这些方面，我仍然使用参数传递的时候我也许应该谈参数传递。我想，人们可以说C＃在此之前4.0，如果你打电话给你不关心参数名的方法，而成为名时，你可以在参数指定它们的显著元数据的一部分。

Yes, you're absolutely right (to my mind, anyway). Ironically, although I'm usually picky about these terms, I still use "parameter passing" when I should probably talk about "argument passing". I suppose one could argue that prior to C# 4.0, if you're calling a method you don't care about the parameter names, whereas the names become part of the significant metadata when you can specify them on the arguments as well.

我同意它的确与众不同，这术语是非常重要的。

I agree that it makes a difference, and that terminology is important.

可选参数肯定是好的，但 - 这是添加元数据参数，当你还没来得及这样做:)（话虽如此，它不会是可选的产生IL ...计）

"Optional parameters" is definitely okay though - that's adding metadata to the parameter when you couldn't do so before :) (Having said that, it's not going to be optional in terms of the generated IL...)

你想我要求团队对他们的反馈意见？

Would you like me to ask the team for their feedback?

这篇关于不应该C＃4.0的新＆QUOT;命名参数＆QUOT;功能被称为＆QUOT;命名参数＆QUOT;？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！