多行的 SQL 查询 [英] SQL query over multiple rows
本文介绍了多行的 SQL 查询的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！
问题描述
我有一个看起来像这样的表格:
I have a Table which looks like this:
---------------------------
|housing_id | facility_id |
---------------------------
| 1 | 7 |
| 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 7 |
---------------------------
现在我想要做的是获取所有设施 ID 为 7 AND 4 的 Housing_id.因此，在这种情况下，查询应该只返回 Housing_id 1.数据库是mysql.
Now what i want to do is get all housing_ids with a facility_id of 7 AND 4. So the query should only return the housing_id 1 in this case. Database is mysql.
推荐答案
另一种方法是 -
SELECT housing_id
FROM mytable
WHERE facility_id IN (4,7)
GROUP BY housing_id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT facility_id) = 2
更新 - 受到 Josvic 评论的启发，我决定进行更多测试，并认为我会包括我的发现.
UPDATE - inspired by the comment by Josvic I decided to do some more testing and thought I would include my findings.
使用这个查询的好处之一是很容易修改以包含更多的设施 ID.如果您想查找所有具有 factory_ids 1, 3, 4 & 的 Housing_ids7 你就做 -
One of the benefits of using this query is that it is easy to modify to include more facility_ids. If you want to find all housing_ids that have facility_ids 1, 3, 4 & 7 you just do -
SELECT housing_id
FROM mytable
WHERE facility_id IN (1,3,4,7)
GROUP BY housing_id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT facility_id) = 4
所有这三个查询的性能因所采用的索引策略而异.无论使用何种索引，我都无法在我的测试数据集上从依赖子查询版本获得合理的性能.
The performance of all three of these queries varies hugely based on the indexing strategy employed. I was unable to get reasonable performance, on my test dataset, from the dependant subquery version regardless of indexing used.
Tim 提供的自连接解决方案在给定两列上单独的单列索引的情况下表现非常好，但随着条件数量的增加表现不佳.
The self join solution provided by Tim performs very well given separate single column indices on the two columns but does not perform quite so well as the number of criteria increases.
以下是我的测试表上的一些基本统计数据 - 50 万行 - 147963 个 Housing_ids，其中 factory_id 的潜在值在 1 到 9 之间.
Here are some basic stats on my test table - 500k rows - 147963 housing_ids with potential values for facility_id between 1 and 9.
以下是用于运行所有这些测试的索引 -
Here are the indices used for running all these tests -
SHOW INDEXES FROM mytable;
+---------+------------+---------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+
| Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type |
+---------+------------+---------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+
| mytable | 0 | UQ_housing_facility | 1 | housing_id | A | 500537 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE |
| mytable | 0 | UQ_housing_facility | 2 | facility_id | A | 500537 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE |
| mytable | 0 | UQ_facility_housing | 1 | facility_id | A | 12 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE |
| mytable | 0 | UQ_facility_housing | 2 | housing_id | A | 500537 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE |
| mytable | 1 | IX_housing | 1 | housing_id | A | 500537 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE |
| mytable | 1 | IX_facility | 1 | facility_id | A | 12 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE |
+---------+------------+---------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+
测试的第一个查询是依赖子查询 -
First query tested is the dependant subquery -
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE DISTINCT housing_id
FROM mytable
WHERE housing_id IN (SELECT housing_id FROM mytable WHERE facility_id=4)
AND housing_id IN (SELECT housing_id FROM mytable WHERE facility_id=7);
17321 rows in set (9.15 sec)
+----+--------------------+---------+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+------------+--------+---------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+--------------------+---------+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+------------+--------+---------------------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | mytable | range | NULL | IX_housing | 4 | NULL | 500538 | Using where; Using index for group-by |
| 3 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | mytable | unique_subquery | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | func,const | 1 | Using index; Using where |
| 2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | mytable | unique_subquery | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | func,const | 1 | Using index; Using where |
+----+--------------------+---------+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+------------+--------+---------------------------------------+
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE DISTINCT housing_id
FROM mytable
WHERE housing_id IN (SELECT housing_id FROM mytable WHERE facility_id=1)
AND housing_id IN (SELECT housing_id FROM mytable WHERE facility_id=3)
AND housing_id IN (SELECT housing_id FROM mytable WHERE facility_id=4)
AND housing_id IN (SELECT housing_id FROM mytable WHERE facility_id=7);
567 rows in set (9.30 sec)
+----+--------------------+---------+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+------------+--------+---------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+--------------------+---------+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+------------+--------+---------------------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | mytable | range | NULL | IX_housing | 4 | NULL | 500538 | Using where; Using index for group-by |
| 5 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | mytable | unique_subquery | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | func,const | 1 | Using index; Using where |
| 4 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | mytable | unique_subquery | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | func,const | 1 | Using index; Using where |
| 3 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | mytable | unique_subquery | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | func,const | 1 | Using index; Using where |
| 2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | mytable | unique_subquery | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | func,const | 1 | Using index; Using where |
+----+--------------------+---------+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+------------+--------+---------------------------------------+
接下来是我的版本使用 GROUP BY ... HAVING COUNT ...
Next is my version using the GROUP BY ... HAVING COUNT ...
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE housing_id
FROM mytable
WHERE facility_id IN (4,7)
GROUP BY housing_id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT facility_id) = 2;
17321 rows in set (0.79 sec)
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------------------------+-------------+---------+------+--------+------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------------------------+-------------+---------+------+--------+------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | mytable | range | UQ_facility_housing,IX_facility | IX_facility | 4 | NULL | 198646 | Using where; Using index; Using filesort |
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------------------------+-------------+---------+------+--------+------------------------------------------+
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE housing_id
FROM mytable
WHERE facility_id IN (1,3,4,7)
GROUP BY housing_id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT facility_id) = 4;
567 rows in set (1.25 sec)
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------------------------+-------------+---------+------+--------+------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------------------------+-------------+---------+------+--------+------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | mytable | range | UQ_facility_housing,IX_facility | IX_facility | 4 | NULL | 407160 | Using where; Using index; Using filesort |
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------------------------+-------------+---------+------+--------+------------------------------------------+
最后但并非最不重要的自连接 -
And last but not least the self join -
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE a.housing_id
FROM mytable a
INNER JOIN mytable b
ON a.housing_id = b.housing_id
WHERE a.facility_id = 4 AND b.facility_id = 7;
17321 rows in set (1.37 sec)
+----+-------------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+-------------------------+-------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+-------------------------+-------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | b | ref | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | IX_facility | 4 | const | 94598 | Using index |
| 1 | SIMPLE | a | eq_ref | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | test.b.housing_id,const | 1 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+-------------------------+-------+-------------+
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE a.housing_id
FROM mytable a
INNER JOIN mytable b
ON a.housing_id = b.housing_id
INNER JOIN mytable c
ON a.housing_id = c.housing_id
INNER JOIN mytable d
ON a.housing_id = d.housing_id
WHERE a.facility_id = 1
AND b.facility_id = 3
AND c.facility_id = 4
AND d.facility_id = 7;
567 rows in set (1.64 sec)
+----+-------------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+-------------------------+-------+--------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+-------------------------+-------+--------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | b | ref | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | IX_facility | 4 | const | 93782 | Using index |
| 1 | SIMPLE | d | eq_ref | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | test.b.housing_id,const | 1 | Using index |
| 1 | SIMPLE | c | eq_ref | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | test.b.housing_id,const | 1 | Using index |
| 1 | SIMPLE | a | eq_ref | UQ_housing_facility,UQ_facility_housing,IX_housing,IX_facility | UQ_housing_facility | 8 | test.d.housing_id,const | 1 | Using where; Using index |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+-------------------------+-------+--------------------------+
这篇关于多行的 SQL 查询的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
查看全文
