优化 - 将目标和梯度函数参数作为列表传递 [英] optimization - Passing objective and gradient function arguments as list
问题描述
我有一个函数可以同时评估梯度和输出.我想针对目标函数对其进行优化.如何将目标和梯度作为列表传递给 optimx
?下面的例子说明了这个问题:
I have a function that evaluates the gradient and output simultaneously. I want to optimize it with respect to an objective function. How do I pass the objective and gradient as a list to optimx
? The example below illustrates the problem:
假设我想找到多项式 x^4 - 3*x^2 + 2*x + 3
的最小非负根.它的梯度是4*x^3 - 6*x + 2
.我在optimx
中使用了nlminb
方法,如下图.
Suppose I want to find the smallest non-negative root of the polynomial x^4 - 3*x^2 + 2*x + 3
. Its gradient is 4*x^3 - 6*x + 2
. I use the method nlminb
in optimx
, as shown below.
optimx(par = 100, method = "nlminb", fn = function(x) x^4 - 3*x^2 + 2*x + 3,
gr=function(x) 4*x^3 - 6*x + 2, lower = 0)
这很好用,我得到以下输出:
This works fine, and I get the following output:
p1 value fevals gevals niter convcode kkt1 kkt2 xtimes
nlminb 1 3 27 24 23 0 TRUE TRUE 0
现在假设我定义了函数 fngr
,它以列表的形式返回目标和梯度:
Now suppose I define the function fngr
, which returns both the objective and gradient as a list:
fngr <- function(x) {
fn <- x^4 - 3*x^2 + 2*x + 3
gr <- 4*x^3 - 6*x + 2
return (list(fn = fn, gr = gr))
}
我尝试按如下方式调用 optimx
:
I tried to call optimx
as follows:
do.call(optimx, c(list(par = 100, lower = 0, method="nlminb"), fngr))
这返回了以下错误:
Error in optimx.check(par, optcfg$ufn, optcfg$ugr, optcfg$uhess, lower, :
Function provided is not returning a scalar number
当我想将目标和梯度作为列表传递时,定义 fngr
和调用 optimx
的正确方法是什么?
What is the right way to define fngr
and the call to optimx
when I want to pass the objective and gradient as a list?
谢谢.
推荐答案
定义一个无参数函数,它可以用合适的名字传递两个函数......当被调用时:
Define a parameter-less function which can deliver the two functions with suitable names ... when called:
> fngr <- function() {
+ fn <- function(x) {x^4 - 3*x^2 + 2*x + 3}
+ gr <- function(x) {4*x^3 - 6*x + 2}
+ return (list(fn = fn, gr = gr))
+ }
> do.call(optimx, c(list(par = 100, lower = 0, method="nlminb"), fngr() ))
notice the need to call it ------^^
p1 value fevals gevals niter convcode kkt1 kkt2 xtimes
nlminb 1 3 27 24 23 0 TRUE TRUE 0.002
5 年后看到这个,我可以完全理解这种困惑.@ user3294195 的做法更为典型.这不是 R 中传递函数对象的典型方式.
Looking at this 5 years later I can fully understand the confusion. The way that @ user3294195 did it was much more typical. This is not a typical way of passing function objects in R.
这篇关于优化 - 将目标和梯度函数参数作为列表传递的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!