在数组声明INT [] K，I和INT []，I K; [英] in array declaration int[] k,i and int k[],i;

问题描述

在声明数组我们可以用括号标识的任何一方，但在这样的：

While declaring array we can use brackets any side of the identifier but in the case:

int[] k,i;

和

int k[],i;

有将两种不同的方式来考虑。这是第一个创建两个数组k和我。
该第二个创建一个数组k和正常的变量i。这是什么行为？

It will be considered in two different ways. That is first one creates two arrays k and i. that second one creates an array k and a normal variable i. What is this behavior?

编辑：在Java中我们通常preFER第一类型声明。但在这种情况下，我们不能建立在单个语句的数组和基本变量。

in java usually we prefer first type of declaration. but in this case we cant create an array and a primitive variable in the single statement.

推荐答案

我的猜的是以下内容：

声明 INT [] K 更符合逻辑的，因为它声明 K 是一个的阵列的 INT 的。因此，它是preferred（？）式中的Java

The declaration int[] k is more logical, because it declares k to be an array of int. Therefore, it is the preferred (?) style in Java.

时int k [] ，在另一方面，被宣告此阵中C方式（K＆安培; R有着不同的理念，当它来声明语法 - 他们通缉声明模仿的访问应用于变量），缓解C程序员转型，这个语法也被允许的 - 又何妨呢

int k[], on the other hand, was the C way of declaring this array (K&R had a different philosophy when it came to declaration syntax – they wanted declarations to mimic access to the variable) and to ease the transition for C programmers, this syntax was also allowed – no harm done.

现在，在你上面的说法你已经链接两个声明。在第一种情况下，这两个变量声明为同一类型的 - 这显然是 INT [] 。然而，在第二code这种行为是反直觉（以及从C的行为也不同），因此具有其他语义。

Now, in your above statement you have chained two declarations. In the first case, both variables are declared with the same type – which is clearly int[]. However, in the second code this behaviour would be counter-intuitive (and also different from C’s behaviour), and therefore has other semantics.

请记住，这纯粹是一种猜测。

Keep in mind that this is purely a guess.

这篇关于在数组声明INT [] K，I和INT []，I K;的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！