更好的查询策略,按文件哈希频率和文件大小对文件进行排序 [英] Better query strategy to sort files by file hash frequency and file size
本文介绍了更好的查询策略,按文件哈希频率和文件大小对文件进行排序的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
我没有多想就写了这个查询,但作为初学者,我几乎可以肯定它可以写得更好.
I've wrote this query without much thought but as a beginner I'm almost sure it could be written better.
这里是:
SELECT filehash, filename, filesize, group_files
FROM files
INNER JOIN ( SELECT filehash group_id,
COUNT(filehash) group_files
FROM files
GROUP BY filehash) groups
ON files.filehash = groups.group_id
ORDER BY group_files DESC,
filesize DESC
表定义:
CREATE TABLE files (fileid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
filename TEXT,
filesize INTEGER,
filehash TEXT)
索引定义:
CREATE INDEX files_filehash_idx
ON files(filehash)
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX files_filename_idx
ON files(filename)
CREATE INDEX files_filesize_idx
ON files(filesize)
查询解释查询计划:
selectid order from detail
1 0 0 SCAN TABLE files USING COVERING INDEX files_filehash_idx (~1000000 rows)
0 0 1 SCAN SUBQUERY 1 AS groups (~100 rows)
0 1 0 SEARCH TABLE files USING INDEX files_filehash_idx (filehash=?) (~10 rows)
0 0 0 USE TEMP B-TREE FOR ORDER BY
如果我错了,你能纠正我吗?提前致谢.
Could you correct me if I'm wrong? Thank you in advance.
推荐答案
你觉得这个版本怎么样?
What do you think about this version?
select filehash, group_concat(filename), filesize, count(*) as group_files
from files
group by filehash
order by group_files desc
看起来可能会运行得更快.它可以满足您的需求吗?
It seems like that will probably run faster. Does it do what you need?
这篇关于更好的查询策略,按文件哈希频率和文件大小对文件进行排序的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文