php pop/push/shift/unshift,哪些用于队列,哪些用于堆栈 [英] php pop/push/shift/unshift, which to use for queues and which for stacks
问题描述
在 PHP 中,有两种方法可以将数组用作堆栈 (LIFO)
以及将它们用作队列 (FIFO) 的两种方法.
In PHP there are two ways to use an array as a stack (LIFO)
and two ways to use them as a queue (FIFO).
可以使用 push
& 实现一个 stack弹出
,
但是同样可以用 unshift
&shift
.
One could implement a stack with push
& pop
,
but the same can be done with unshift
& shift
.
类似地,可以使用 push
& 实现 队列shift
,
但是同样可以用 unshift
&pop
.
Similarly one could implement a queue with push
& shift
,
but the same can be done with unshift
& pop
.
演示:
echo "stack push & pop approach:\n";
$s = []; array_push($s, 'first'); array_push($s, 'second'); array_push($s, 'third');
echo array_pop($s) . '-' . array_pop($s) . '-' . array_pop($s) . "\n";
echo "stack unshift & shift approach:\n";
$s = []; array_unshift($s, 'first'); array_unshift($s, 'second'); array_unshift($s, 'third');
echo array_shift($s) . '-' . array_shift($s) . '-' . array_shift($s) . "\n";
echo "queue push & shift approach:\n";
$q = []; array_push($q, 'first'); array_push($q, 'second'); array_push($q, 'third');
echo array_shift($q) . '-' . array_shift($q) . '-' . array_shift($q) . "\n";
echo "queue unshift & pop approach:\n";
$q = []; array_unshift($q, 'first'); array_unshift($q, 'second'); array_unshift($q, 'third');
echo array_pop($q) . '-' . array_pop($q) . '-' . array_pop($q) . "\n";
输出:
stack push & pop approach:
third-second-first
stack unshift & shift approach:
third-second-first
queue push & shift approach:
first-second-third
queue unshift & pop approach:
first-second-third
那么使用哪些函数集?!
So which sets of functions to use?!
推荐答案
简短回答
对于 stack 使用 push
&pop
(添加到末尾,从末尾取出).
Short answer
For stacks use push
& pop
(add to end, take from end).
对于队列使用push
&shift
(添加到结尾,从头开始).
For queues use push
& shift
(add to end, take from beginning).
在考虑截至今天 2016-12-29 的这些函数的 PHP 文档时,我们发现:
When considering the PHP documentation as of today 2016-12-29 for these functions we find this:
对于array_push():
描述 提到array_push() 将数组视为堆栈"
而示例使用$stack
".
For array_push():
the description mentions "array_push() treats array as a stack"
and the example uses "$stack
".
对于array_pop():
描述没有提到堆栈或队列
而示例使用$stack
".
For array_pop():
the description mentions nothing on stacks or queues
and the example uses "$stack
".
对于array_shift():
描述没有提到堆栈或队列(但提到需要重新索引)
而示例使用$stack
".
For array_shift():
the description mentions nothing on stacks or queues (but mentions required reindexing)
and the example uses "$stack
".
对于array_unshift():
描述没有提到堆栈或队列(但提到需要重新索引)
而示例使用$queue
".
For array_unshift():
the description mentions nothing on stacks or queues (but mentions required reindexing)
and the example uses "$queue
".
所以这建议使用 push
&pop
用于堆栈(基于描述中的提及)
并建议使用 unshift
&pop
用于队列(仅基于示例中提到的队列).
So this suggests using push
& pop
for stacks (based on mention in description)
and suggests using unshift
& pop
for queues (based on only mention of queue in examples).
这似乎有点单薄...这里提交了改进文档的建议:https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73839
This seems a bit thin... A suggestion to improve the documentation has been submitted here: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73839
运行:
echo "\nstack push & pop approach : ";
$a=[];$i=0;$t=microtime(true); while($i<100000) { array_push($a, 'dummy'); array_pop($a); ++$i; }; echo (microtime(true) - $t);
echo "\nstack unshift & shift approach: ";
$a=[];$i=0;$t=microtime(true); while($i<100000) { array_unshift($a, 'dummy'); array_shift($a); ++$i; }; echo (microtime(true) - $t);
echo "\nqueue push & shift approach : ";
$a=[];$i=0;$t=microtime(true); while($i<100000) { array_push($a, 'dummy'); array_shift($a); ++$i; }; echo (microtime(true) - $t);
echo "\nqueue unshift & pop approach : ";
$a=[];$i=0;$t=microtime(true); while($i<100000) { array_unshift($a, 'dummy'); array_pop($a); ++$i; }; echo (microtime(true) - $t);
返回:
stack push & pop approach : 0.011210918426514
stack unshift & shift approach: 0.015399217605591
queue push & shift approach : 0.011627912521362
queue unshift & pop approach : 0.015273094177246
对于 stacks 这建议使用 push
&pop
:自然术语,匹配文档中的提及并且性能更好(考虑到同时使用 unshift
和 shift
重新索引,这是有道理的).
For stacks this suggests to use push
& pop
: natural terminology, matching the mention in the documentation and also performing better (which makes sense considering the reindexing with both unshift
& shift
).
对于队列,这建议使用push
&shift
,尽管文档中有提到.
For queues this suggests to use push
& shift
, despite the mention in the documentation.
这篇关于php pop/push/shift/unshift,哪些用于队列,哪些用于堆栈的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!