为什么lua阵（表）1而不是0开始？ [英] Why do Lua arrays(tables) start at 1 instead of 0?

问题描述

我不明白的Lua这一部分的决定背后的理性。为什么索引从1开始？我已阅读（许多其他一样）这个伟大的纸。在我看来，这是非常愉快的学习和编程语言的一个奇怪的角落。不要误会我的意思，Lua是好了，但必须有一个解释的地方。大部分我发现（在网络上），只是说该指数从1开始的句号。

I don't understand the rational behind the decision of this part of Lua. Why does indexing start at 1? I have read (as many others did) this great paper. It seems to me a strange corner of a language that is very pleasant to learn and program. Don't get me wrong, Lua is just great but there has to be an explanation somewhere. Most of what I found (on the web) is just saying the index starts at 1. Full stop.

这将是非常有趣的阅读是什么，它​​的设计者说一下这个问题。

It would be very interesting to read what its designers said about the subject.

请注意，我是非常初学者Lua中，我希望我不缺有关表了一些东西明显。

Note that I am "very" beginner in Lua, I hope I am not missing something obvious about tables.

推荐答案

Lua是由溶胶，专为石油工程师在计算机编程没有正式训练的语言后裔。在计算没有受过训练的人认为这是该死的怪异从零开始计数。通过采用基于1的数组和字符串索引，Lua的设计避免混淆他们的第一个客户和赞助商的期望。

Lua is descended from Sol, a language designed for petroleum engineers with no formal training in computer programming. People not trained in computing think it is damned weird to start counting at zero. By adopting 1-based array and string indexing, the Lua designers avoided confounding the expectations of their first clients and sponsors.

虽然我也发现他们在一开始奇怪，我已经学会了爱为基础的0阵列。但我得到确定用Lua的1基于阵列，特别是
使用Lua的通用为循环和 ipairs 运营商的MDASH; I＆NBSP;通常可以避免担心只是数组索引方式

Although I too found them weird at the beginning, I have learned to love 0-based arrays. But I get by OK with Lua's 1-based arrays, especially by using Lua's generic for loop and the ipairs operator—I can usually avoid worrying about just how arrays are indexed.

这篇关于为什么lua阵（表）1而不是0开始？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！