WSDL 2.0 到 RDF 映射的优点和预期用途是什么? [英] What are the advantages and the intended use of the WSDL 2.0 to RDF mapping?

问题描述

WSDL 2.0 入门包括映射到 RDF 和语义 Web 部分.http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-primer/#adv-rdf-mapping

来自以上参考资料:

<块引用>

以 RDF 表示的 WSDL 2.0 文档可以更容易地扩展使用任意 RDF 断言和 WSDL 2.0 信息可以更多容易与任意其他知识相关联.

这里也描述了映射.http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/><块引用>

本文档描述了该模型在资源中的表示描述语言 (RDF) 和 Web 本体语言 (OWL)，以及用于将特定 WSDL 描述转换为的映射过程他们的 RDF 形式.

因此可以将 WSDL 2.0 文档映射到 RDF，然后在知识系统中使用.

一些应用程序/用途可能包括:

• 基于 RDF 的自动化 WS 客户端生成器.
• 以标准方式在 RDF 支持的系统中包含 Web 服务信息.

应该不止这些.我想了解 WSDL 2.0 到 RDF 映射打算解决哪些应用程序.

WSDL 2.0 到 RDF 映射的预期应用是什么?

WSDL 2.0 到 RDF 映射相对于其他方法有哪些优势?

在这种映射提供优于其他方法的情况下的一些很好的例子会很棒.

解决方案

在 Semantic Web Registry for Bioinformatics 我们使用了 WSDL 2.0 RDF 映射库(WSDL 2.0 RDF java 库)来表达所有作为 OWL 本体的服务.当我们需要搜索适当的服务(通过 SPARQL)时，这简化了注册表查询.我们还使用注释跟踪 - 我们可以跟踪用户做了哪些注释，因此不允许未经授权的用户修改/删除它们.

The WSDL 2.0 primer includes a Mapping to RDF and Semantic Web Section. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-primer/#adv-rdf-mapping

From the above references:

A WSDL 2.0 document represented in RDF can be more easily extended with arbitrary RDF assertions and the WSDL 2.0 information can be more easily associated with arbitrary other knowledge.

The mapping is also described here. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/

This document describes a representation of that model in the Resource Description Language (RDF) and in the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and a mapping procedure for transforming particular WSDL descriptions into their RDF form.

So a WSDL 2.0 document can be mapped to RDF and then used in a knowledge system.

Some applications/usages could include:

• Automated RDF based WS client generators.
• Including Web Service information in an RDF backed system in a standard way.

There should be more than this. I would like to understand what applications the WSDL 2.0 to RDF mapping intends to address.

What are the intended applications of the WSDL 2.0 to RDF mapping?

And what are advantages of the WSDL 2.0 to RDF mapping in respect to other methods?

Some nice examples in a situation where the this mapping provides an advantage over other methods would be great.

解决方案

In Semantic Web Registry for Bioinformatics we used our WSDL 2.0 RDF mapping library ( WSDL 2.0 RDF java library ) to express all the services as an OWL ontology. This simplifies the registry querying when we need to search an appropriate service (via SPARQL). Also we use annotation tracking - we can keep track what user made which annotation, so doesn't allow unauthorized users modify/delete them.

这篇关于WSDL 2.0 到 RDF 映射的优点和预期用途是什么?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！