在矩阵累计总和 [英] Cumulative sum in a matrix

查看:224
本文介绍了在矩阵累计总和的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个像

A= [ 1 2 4
     2 3 1
     3 1 2 ]

我想通过行和列通过计算其累计总和,就是我想要的结果是

and I would like to calculate its cumulative sum by row and by column, that is, I want the result to be

B = [ 1  3  7 
      3  8  13 
      6  12 19 ]

如何在一个快速的方式使这个R中的任何想法? (可能使用功能cumsum)
(我有巨大的矩阵)

Any ideas of how to make this in R in a fast way? (Possibly using the function cumsum) (I have huge matrices)

谢谢!

推荐答案

一个单行:

t(apply(apply(A, 2, cumsum)), 1, cumsum))

底层的观察是,你可以先计算在列的累积和,然后这个矩阵在行的累计总和。

The underlying observation is that you can first compute the cumulative sums over the columns and then the cumulative sum of this matrix over the rows.

请注意:在做行,你要转的结果矩阵

Note: When doing the rows, you have to transpose the resulting matrix.

您例如:

> apply(A, 2, cumsum)
     [,1] [,2] [,3]
[1,]    1    2    4
[2,]    3    5    5
[3,]    6    6    7

> t(apply(apply(A, 2, cumsum), 1, cumsum))
     [,1] [,2] [,3]
[1,]    1    3    7
[2,]    3    8   13
[3,]    6   12   19

关于业绩:我现在已经知道这个方法有多好,扩展到大的矩阵。复杂性的角度来看,这应该是接近最优。通常情况下,适用在性能上并不坏为好。

现在我是越来越好奇 - 什么方法是最好的一个?一个简短的风向标:

Now I was getting curious - what approach is the better one? A short benchmark:

> A <- matrix(runif(1000*1000, 1, 500), 1000)
> 
> system.time(
+   B <- t(apply(apply(A, 2, cumsum), 1, cumsum))
+ )
       User      System     elapsed 
      0.082       0.011       0.093 
> 
> system.time(
+   C <- lower.tri(diag(nrow(A)), diag = TRUE) %*% A %*% upper.tri(diag(ncol(A)), diag = TRUE)
+ )
       User      System     elapsed 
      1.519       0.016       1.530 

因此​​:应用由15倍优于矩阵乘法(只是为了对比:MATLAB需要0.10719秒),结果真的不意外,因为适用 - 版本可以在O进行(N ^ 2),而矩阵乘法将需要约为O(n ^ 2.7)计算。因此,如果n是足够大的矩阵乘法提供所有的优化应该会丢失。

Thus: Apply outperforms matrix multiplication by a factor of 15. (Just for comparision: MATLAB needed 0.10719 seconds.) The results do not really surprise, as the apply-version can be done in O(n^2), while the matrix multiplication will need approx. O(n^2.7) computations. Thus, all optimizations that matrix multiplication offers should be lost if n is big enough.

这篇关于在矩阵累计总和的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆