法拉第 vs HTTParty [英] Faraday vs HTTParty

问题描述

Faraday 是首选的 ruby​​ HTTP 客户端库.为什么比 HTTParty 更可取?

Faraday is the ruby HTTP client library of choice. Why is it preferable to use it over HTTParty?

我想比较的一些事情是:

Some things that I would like compared are:

• 性能
• 架构
• 易于使用
• Faraday 中存在但 HTTParty 中没有的功能(反之亦然)
• 使法拉第成为首选图书馆的任何其他方面.

推荐答案

它们在很多方面都不同，但恕我直言，这就是本质:

They differ in many aspects, but here's the essence IMHO:

HTTParty:- 使用网络/http- 一些魔法(例如解析 JSON 响应)

HTTParty: - Uses net/http - Some magic (e.g. parse JSON responses)

法拉第:- 大多数 http 库的包装器(excon、typhoeus、net-http-persistent 等)- 允许制作适合您特定需求的请求和响应中间件.

Faraday: - A wrapper around most of the http libraries out there (excon, typhoeus, net-http-persistent, etc.) - Allows to craft the request and response middleware that suits your specific needs.

我个人更喜欢 Faraday，因为它允许我切换到任何 http 库，并且因为它允许对请求和响应进行非常精细的控制.

I personally prefer Faraday, as it allows me to switch to any http library, and because it allows very fine-grain control over the request and response.

这篇关于法拉第 vs HTTParty的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！