为什么不能在表达式中使用 ... 语法? [英] Why it is not possible to use the ... syntax in expressions?
问题描述
我正在尝试理解 ...
语法.考虑以下程序:
fn how_many(x: i32) ->&'static str {匹配 x {0 =>没有橘子",1 =>一个橙子",2 |3 =>两三个橙子",9...11 =>大约 10 个橙子",_ =>几个橙子",}}fn 模式匹配(){对于 x 在 0..13 {println!("{} : 我有 {} ", x, how_many(x));}}fn 主(){//println!("{:?}", (2...6));模式匹配();}
在上面的程序中,模式匹配中使用的 9...11
编译得很好.当我尝试在 println!("{:?}", (2...6));
中使用相同的代码时,出现编译错误:
error: `...` 语法不能在表达式中使用-->src/main.rs:18:24|18 |println!("{:?}", (2...6));|^^^|= help: 如果您需要独占范围 (a < b),请使用 `..`= help: 或者 `..=` 如果你需要一个包含范围 (a <= b)
我试图理解为什么不能在 println
中使用.
与不能在表达式中使用 &*$#
的原因相同:Rust 的语法不允许这样做.Rust 决定对包含范围使用不同的语法.如果你真的关心完整的细节,你可以阅读关于该问题的所有 350 多条评论.
- 没有人喜欢特定的语法
...
太接近..
的拼写错误模式中的 ...
已经稳定,必须永远支持,但它会在某些时候被弃用,..=
也将成为首选.
错误消息告诉您要使用的适当语法:
<块引用> = help: 如果需要独占范围,请使用 `..` (a < b)= help: 或者 `..=` 如果你需要一个包含范围 (a <= b)
fn how_many(x: i32) ->&'static str {匹配 x {0 =>没有橘子",1 =>一个橙子",2 |3 =>两三个橙子",9..=11 =>大约 10 个橙子",_ =>几个橙子",}}fn 模式匹配(){对于 x 在 0..13 {println!("{} : 我有 {} ", x, how_many(x));}}fn 主(){println!("{:?}", 2..=6);模式匹配();}
I'm trying understand the ...
syntax. Consider the following program:
fn how_many(x: i32) -> &'static str {
match x {
0 => "no oranges",
1 => "an orange",
2 | 3 => "two or three oranges",
9...11 => "approximately 10 oranges",
_ => "few oranges",
}
}
fn pattern_matching() {
for x in 0..13 {
println!("{} : I have {} ", x, how_many(x));
}
}
fn main() {
// println!("{:?}", (2...6));
pattern_matching();
}
In the above program, the 9...11
used in pattern matching compiles fine.
When I try to use the same in like println!("{:?}", (2...6));
I get compilation error:
error: `...` syntax cannot be used in expressions
--> src/main.rs:18:24
|
18 | println!("{:?}", (2...6));
| ^^^
|
= help: Use `..` if you need an exclusive range (a < b)
= help: or `..=` if you need an inclusive range (a <= b)
I'm trying to understand why it is not possible to use within println
.
For the same reason that you cannot use &*$#
in expressions: it's not allowed by Rust's grammar. Rust decided to use different syntax for inclusive ranges. If you really care about the complete details, you can go read all 350+ comments on that issue.
The TL;DR:
- No particular syntax was liked by everyone
...
is too close to a typo of..
...
in patterns is already stabilized and must be supported forever, but it will be deprecated at some point and..=
will be preferred for that as well.
The error message tells you the appropriate syntax to use instead:
= help: Use `..` if you need an exclusive range (a < b) = help: or `..=` if you need an inclusive range (a <= b)
fn how_many(x: i32) -> &'static str {
match x {
0 => "no oranges",
1 => "an orange",
2 | 3 => "two or three oranges",
9..=11 => "approximately 10 oranges",
_ => "few oranges",
}
}
fn pattern_matching() {
for x in 0..13 {
println!("{} : I have {} ", x, how_many(x));
}
}
fn main() {
println!("{:?}", 2..=6);
pattern_matching();
}
这篇关于为什么不能在表达式中使用 ... 语法?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!