ServiceStack 的 TypeSerializer 是否有 OnDeserializing/OnDeserialized 等价物? [英] Is there an OnDeserializing/OnDeserialized equivalent for ServiceStack's TypeSerializer?

查看:48
本文介绍了ServiceStack 的 TypeSerializer 是否有 OnDeserializing/OnDeserialized 等价物?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想将一些代码从使用 .NET 的 DataContractSerializer 切换到使用 ServiceStack 的 TypeSerializer 以提高速度优势.不幸的是,我继承的代码相当依赖于 OnSerializing/OnSerialized/OnDeserializing/OnDeserialized,而 ServiceStack 似乎没有打电话.我错过了什么吗?假设不是,是否有一种滥用事物来伪造预期功能的好方法?OnSerialized/OnDeserialized 可以通过反射粗略近似,但是我对OnSerializingOnDeserializing 不知所措.

I want to switch some code from using .NET's DataContractSerializer to using ServiceStack's TypeSerializer for the increased speed benefits. Unfortunately, the code I inherited relies rather heavily on OnSerializing/OnSerialized/OnDeserializing/OnDeserialized, which ServiceStack appears not to call. Am I missing something? Assuming not, is there a good way to abuse things to fake out the intended functionality? OnSerialized/OnDeserialized can be roughly approximated through reflection, but I'm at a loss for OnSerializing and OnDeserializing.

推荐答案

不,没有这样的设施;您必须使用适当的调用来 fork ServiceStack 或自己进行序列化/反序列化.

No, there is no such facility; you'd have to fork ServiceStack or jacket the serialization/deserialization yourself with appropriate calls.

这篇关于ServiceStack 的 TypeSerializer 是否有 OnDeserializing/OnDeserialized 等价物?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆