如何透明地拦截stdin/out/err [英] How to intercept transparently stdin/out/err

查看:32
本文介绍了如何透明地拦截stdin/out/err的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想捕获命令行程序的所有输入和输出(即 GDB,但为了简单起见,目前已更改为 lscat)并将其重定向到一个文件,供以后分析.

I would like to catch all the inputs and output of a commandline program (namely, GDB, but currently changed to ls or cat for simplicity) and redirect it into a file, for later analysis.

我无法接近工作,但我不明白出了什么问题.这是我最后一次尝试:

I couldn't get anything close to working, but I can't understand what's wrong. Here is my last attempt:

#!/usr/bin/env python2

import subprocess
import sys
import select
import os

def get_pipe():
  fd_r, fd_w = os.pipe()
  return os.fdopen(fd_r, "r"), os.fdopen(fd_w, "w")

out_r, out_w = get_pipe()
err_r, err_w = get_pipe()
in_r, in_w = get_pipe()

proc = subprocess.Popen(["ls"] + sys.argv[1:], stdin=in_r, stdout=out_w, stderr=err_w)

out_w.close()
err_w.close()
in_r.close()

running = True
while running:
  input_lst, output_lst, x_lst = select.select([sys.stdin],[out_r, err_r],  [], 0.5)

  if out_r in output_lst+input_lst:
    data = out_r.readlines()
    print "*",data,"*"
  if err_r in output_lst+input_lst:
    data = err_r.readlines()
    print "+",data,"+"
  if sys.stdin in input_lst:
    data = sys.stdin.readline()
    print "-", data, "-"
    in_w.write(data)

  # don't try to quit if we received some data
  if len(input_lst+output_lst+x_lst) != 0:
    continue
  retcode = proc.poll()
  if retcode is not None:
    running = False

out_r.close()
err_r.close()
in_w.close
exit(retcode)

我尝试了其他几个选项,例如- 编写一个文件包装器,它应该将所有写入标准输入/从标准输出错误读取的内容写入外部文件- 命名管道- ...

I tried several other options, like - writing a file wrapper, which was supposed to write to an external file everything written into stdin / read from stdout-err - named pipes - ...

但我得到的最好的是ls"的第一行.

but the best I obtained was the very first lines of "ls".

而且,GDB的CLI版本依赖readline,我觉得透明捕捉没那么容易!

Moreover, GDB relies on readline for CLI edition, and I feel like it won't be that easy to catch transparently!

推荐答案

所以经过一番研究,我找到了解决这个问题的办法:

So after quite a while of research, I found a solution to this problem:

使用非阻塞读写,我们只需要等待输入文件用完数据(并抛出异常),然后对输出(stdout和标准错误):

with non blocking reads and writes, we just have to wait for the input file to run out of data (and thrown an exception), and then operate on the same for the output (stdout and stderr):

#!/usr/bin/python2

import sys, os
import subprocess
import fcntl

dump = open("/tmp/dump", "w")
dump.write("### starting %s ###" % " ".join(sys.argv))

proc = subprocess.Popen(["<real app>"] + sys.argv[1:], stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)

def nonblocking(fd):
  fl = fcntl.fcntl(fd, fcntl.F_GETFL)
  fcntl.fcntl(fd, fcntl.F_SETFL, fl | os.O_NONBLOCK)

nonblocking(proc.stdin)
nonblocking(proc.stdout)
nonblocking(proc.stderr)

nonblocking(sys.__stdin__)
nonblocking(sys.__stdout__)
nonblocking(sys.__stderr__)

def me_to_proc():
  x_to_y(sys.__stdin__, proc.stdin, "~in> ")

def proc_to_me():
  x_to_y(proc.stdout, sys.__stdout__, "<out~ ")

def proc_to_me_err():
  x_to_y(proc.stderr, sys.__stderr__, "<err~ ")

def x_to_y(x, y, prefix=""):
  try:
    while True:
       line = x.readline()
       to_dump = "%s%s" % (prefix, line)
       print >> dump, to_dump
       print to_dump
       y.write(line)
       y.flush()
       dump.flush()
  except:
    pass

recode = None
while recode is None:
  proc_to_me()
  #proc_to_me_err()
  me_to_proc()

  retcode = proc.poll()

exit(retcode)

只需用此脚本替换您的原始二进制文件,并更改 以创建实际流程.输入输出信息将写入屏幕并转储到/tmp/dump.

just replace your original binary with this script, and change <real app> to create the actual process. In- and out-put information will be written on screen and dumpted into /tmp/dump.

(但是我不确定终止标准,我没有详细检查)

(I'm not sure however about the termination criteria, I didn't check that in details)

这篇关于如何透明地拦截stdin/out/err的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆