您对AutomatedQA 的TestComplete 有何体验? [英] What are your experiences with AutomatedQA's TestComplete?

问题描述

在我的工作场所，我们正在考虑购买 TestComplete，但在使用评估版后，我不确定它是否对我们有任何好处.

At my workplace we are thinking about buying TestComplete but after using the evaluation version, I'm not sure if it will do us any good.

创建测试似乎需要大量工作，我的老板并不完全相信它值得.

Creating tests seems to be a lot of work and my boss is not entirely convinced that it's worth it.

另一方面，我们没有任何单元测试，所以我们迫切需要一些自动化测试.

On the other hand, we don't have any unit tests, so we desperatly need some automated testing.

• 您对 TestComplete 的体验如何?
• 非开发人员可以创建测试是否现实?(无需开发人员的帮助)
• TestComplete 能否取代单元测试?

推荐答案

取决于您要测试的内容.如果您很难模拟 GUI 上的点击，那么 TestComplete 可以很好地做到这一点.对象浏览器和记录功能在这方面非常有用.

Depends on what you want to test. If you are hard pressed to simulate clicks on the GUI then TestComplete does that pretty well. The object browser and recording functions can be pretty useful as far as doing that.

如果您正在尽一切可能避免 GUI 测试的烦恼，那么 VB 脚本、python、perl 或选择您最喜欢的脚本语言.我们决定在我们的项目中使用 JScript，它的实施有时会令人兴奋".

If you are doing whatever you can to avoid the annoyance of GUI testing then VB script, python, perl, or pick your favorite scripting language. We decided to use JScript for our project and the implementation of it can be 'exciting' at times.

基本上浏览功能列表并决定您要使用和不使用的内容.如果您只是打算使用它来收集所有测试用例，请不要打扰.如果您打算大量进行 GUI 测试、分布式测试等，请务必了解它.

Basically go through the list of features and decide what you are going to use and not use. If you are just going to use it to collect all your test cases, don't bother. If you are going to be heavy on GUI testing, distributed testing, etc. by all means get it.

这篇关于您对AutomatedQA 的TestComplete 有何体验?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！