时间高效的部分倒排索引构建 [英] Time efficient Partial Inverted Index building

查看:25
本文介绍了时间高效的部分倒排索引构建的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我需要构建一个部分倒排索引.类似的东西:

I need to build a partial Inverted Index. Something like:

l = {{x, {h, a, b, c}}, {y, {c, d, e}}}
iI[l]
(*
-> {{a, {x}}, {b, {x}}, {c, {x, y}}, {d, {y}}, {e, {y}}, {h, {x}}}
*)

我认为它的作用很明显.在输入列表中,{x, y ...} 是唯一的,而 {a, b, c, ..} 不是.输出应该按 #[[1]] 排序.

I think it is pretty clear what it does. In the input list, the {x, y ...} are unique, while the {a, b, c, ..} are not. The output ought to be ordered by #[[1]].

现在,我正在这样做:

iI[list_List] := {#, list[[Position[list, #][[All, 1]]]][[All, 1]]} & /@ 
                     (Union@Flatten@Last@Transpose@list)

但是对于这么简单的任务来说看起来太复杂了,看起来太慢了,我应该可以应付Legion.

But it looks too convoluted for such an easy task, seems too slow, and I should be able to cope with Legion.

用于比较结果的试驾:

words = DictionaryLookup[];
abWords = DictionaryLookup["ab" ~~ ___];
l = {#, RandomChoice[abWords, RandomInteger[{1, 30}]]} & /@ words[[1 ;; 3000]];
First@Timing@iI[l]
(*
-> 5.312
*)

那么,有什么加速的想法吗?

So, any ideas for an speedup?

推荐答案

似乎是Reap-Sow 的经典任务(由于@Heike 在最终版本中有所改进):

Seems a classic task for Reap-Sow (improvement in the final version due to @Heike):

iI[list_] := Sort[Reap[Sow @@@ list, _, List][[2]]] 

那么,

iI[l]

{{a, {x}}, {b, {x}}, {c, {x, y}}, {d, {y}}, {e, {y}}, {h, {x}}}

In[22]:= 
words=DictionaryLookup[];
abWords=DictionaryLookup["ab"~~___];
l={#,RandomChoice[abWords,RandomInteger[{1,30}]]}&/@words[[1;;3000]];
First@Timing@iI[l]
Out[25]= 0.047

编辑

这是一个具有类似(稍差)性能的替代版本:

Here is an alternative version with a similar (slightly worse) performance:

iIAlt[list_] :=
   Sort@Transpose[{#[[All, 1, 2]], #[[All, All, 1]]}] &@
           GatherBy[Flatten[Thread /@ list, 1], Last];

有趣的是,Reap - Sow 在这里给出了一种比基于结构操作的解决方案更快的解决方案.

It is interesting that Reap - Sow here gives an even slightly faster solution than the one based on structural operations.

编辑 2

仅作说明 - 对于那些喜欢基于规则的解决方案的人,这里有一个基于 DispatchReplaceList 的组合:

Just for an illustration - for those who prefer rule-based solutions, here is one based on a combination of Dispatch and ReplaceList:

iIAlt1[list_] :=
   With[{disp = Dispatch@Flatten[Thread[Rule[#2, #]] & @@@ list]},
       Map[{#, ReplaceList[#, disp]} &, Union @@ list[[All, 2]]]]

不过,它比其他两个慢了大约 2-3 倍.

It is about 2-3 times slower than the other two, though.

这篇关于时间高效的部分倒排索引构建的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆