XML+XSL 表示应该使用什么内容类型? [英] What content-type should be used for XML+XSL presentation?

问题描述

我正在尝试在浏览器中呈现 XML+XSL 2.0，返回带有 application/xml 内容类型和 .xsl 的 .xml 页面带有 text/xml 的页面.Safari 抱怨主文档:资源被解释为文档，但使用 MIME 类型 application/xml 传输."(但一直渲染一切都很好).

I'm trying to render XML+XSL 2.0 in browser, returning .xml pages with application/xml content type and .xsl pages with text/xml. Safari is complaining for the main document: "Resource interpreted as document but transferred with MIME type application/xml." (but keeps rendering everything just fine).

我想去掉这个警告信息.XML 文档应该使用哪些内容类型?

I want to get rid of this warning message. What content-types should be used for the XML document?

推荐答案

我已经成功使用 text/xml 和样式表作为 text/xsl(或者也许这与 text/xml 一样可以，因为您可以使用它).text/xsl 被广泛认可，但不是官方的"(据我所知).

I've had success using text/xml with the stylesheet as text/xsl (or perhaps this is OK as text/xml as you have it working). text/xsl is widely recognized, but not "official" (as far as I understand it).

根据 RFC 3023:如果一个 XML 文档，即未经处理的源 XML 文档可供临时用户阅读，text/xml 比 application/xml 更可取>. 不明确支持 text/xml 的 MIME 用户代理(和 Web 用户代理)会将其视为 text/plain，例如，通过将 XML MIME 实体显示为纯文本.<当普通用户无法读取 XML MIME 实体时，最好使用 code>application/xml."

According to RFC 3023: "If an XML document that is, the unprocessed, source XML document is readable by casual users, text/xml is preferable to application/xml. MIME user agents (and web user agents) that do not have explicit support for text/xml will treat it as text/plain, for example, by displaying the XML MIME entity as plain text. application/xml is preferable when the XML MIME entity is unreadable by casual users."

参见 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3023#page-16

这篇关于XML+XSL 表示应该使用什么内容类型?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！