apache 到 tomcat:mod_jk 与 mod_proxy [英] apache to tomcat: mod_jk vs mod_proxy

问题描述

使用 mod_jk 和 mod_proxy 将 apache 前置 tomcat 实例的优缺点是什么?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of using mod_jk and mod_proxy for fronting a tomcat instance with apache?

多年来我一直在生产中使用 mod_jk，但我听说这是面向 tomcat 的老方法".我应该考虑改变吗?会有什么好处吗?

I've been using mod_jk in production for years but I've heard that it's "the old way" of fronting tomcat. Should I consider changing? Would there be any benefits?

推荐答案

http://blog.jboss.org/一个>

mod_proxy

* Pros:
      o No need for a separate module compilation and maintenance. mod_proxy,
        mod_proxy_http, mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_balancer comes as part of 
        standard Apache 2.2+ distribution
      o Ability to use http https or AJP protocols, even within the same 
        balancer.
* Cons:
      o mod_proxy_ajp does not support large 8K+ packet sizes.
      o Basic load balancer
      o Does not support Domain model clustering

mod_jk

* Pros:
      o Advanced load balancer
      o Advanced node failure detection
      o Support for large AJP packet sizes
* Cons:
      o Need to build and maintain a separate module

这篇关于apache 到 tomcat:mod_jk 与 mod_proxy的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！