.NET Core 中 [Serializable] 的等价物是什么?(转换项目) [英] What is the equivalent of [Serializable] in .NET Core ? (Conversion Projects)
问题描述
在许多情况下,当我想将当前的 .NET Framework 项目转换为等效的 .NET Core 时,某些类具有 Serializable 属性.
In many cases, when I want to convert current .NET Framework projects to .NET Core equivalent, some classes have Serializable attribute.
我应该怎么做才能在 .NET Core 中转换它们?(这次我删了!!!)
What should I do for convert them in .NET Core ? (In this time I delete them !!!)
编辑
考虑这个代码:
using System;
namespace DotLiquid.Exceptions
{
[Serializable] // I delete it now !!!!!!!
public class FilterNotFoundException : Exception
{
public FilterNotFoundException(string message, FilterNotFoundException innerException)
: base(message, innerException)
{
}
public FilterNotFoundException(string message, params string[] args)
: base(string.Format(message, args))
{
}
public FilterNotFoundException(string message)
: base(message)
{
}
}
}
上面没有 [Serializable] 的代码在 .NET Core 中没有语法问题.
above code without [Serializable] works in .NET Core without syntax problem.
但是我想知道什么时候删除[Serializable]
But I want to know when I delete [Serializable]
什么是副作用?
应该改哪些地方?
我什么时候应该使用 JSON.NET(或 ...)而不是 [Serializable] ?
When should I use JSON.NET (or ...) instead of [Serializable] ?
推荐答案
如果你不序列化类型(即使用BinaryFormatter
),那么你可以删除[Serializable]
忘记它.
If you aren't serializing the type (that is, using BinaryFormatter
), then you can remove [Serializable]
and forget about it.
如果您之前使用 BinaryFormatter 进行序列化,那么您需要制定自己的工作计划(即通过 Json.net 或 XML).
If you were using BinaryFormatter to serialize before, then you will need to come up with your own plan on how that will work (ie. via Json.net or XML).
如果您要移植一个库并代表您的消费者询问,那么答案是一样的:删除 [Serializable]
并将序列化留给需要它的人.
If you are porting a library and asking on behalf of your consumers then the answer is the same: remove [Serializable]
and leave serialization up to those who need it.
这篇关于.NET Core 中 [Serializable] 的等价物是什么?(转换项目)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!