如何在每个 XUnit 测试中隔离 EF InMemory 数据库 [英] How to isolate EF InMemory database per XUnit test

查看:27
本文介绍了如何在每个 XUnit 测试中隔离 EF InMemory 数据库的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在尝试使用 InMemory EF7 数据库进行我的 xunit 存储库测试.

I am trying use InMemory EF7 database for my xunit repository test.

但我的问题是,当我尝试处理创建的上下文时,内存中的数据库会持续存在.这意味着一项测试涉及另一项.

But my problem is that when i try to Dispose the created context the in memory db persist. It means that one test involve other.

我已阅读这篇文章 使用内存中数据存储对实体框架 7 进行单元测试,我尝试在我的 TestClass 的构造函数中设置上下文.但是这种方法行不通.当我单独运行测试时,一切正常,但我的第一个测试方法将一些内容添加到数据库中,第二个测试方法从先前测试方法中的脏数据库开始.我尝试将 IDispose 添加到测试类中,但方法 DatabaseContext 和 DB 保留在内存中.我做错了什么我错过了什么?

I have read this article Unit Testing Entity Framework 7 with the In Memory Data Store and I have tried to setup the context in the constructor of my TestClass. But this approach doesn't work. When I run tests separately everything is OK, but my first test method add something into DB and second test method start with dirty DB from previous test method. I try add IDispose into test class but method DatabaseContext and DB persist in memory. What I am doing wrong am i missing something?

我的代码如下:

using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Xunit;

namespace Fabric.Tests.Repositories
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Test for TaskRepository 
    /// </summary>
    public class TaskRepositoryTests:IDisposable
    {

        private readonly DatabaseContext contextMemory;

        /// <summary>
        /// Constructor
        /// </summary>
        public TaskRepositoryTests()
        {
            var optionsBuilder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<DatabaseContext>();
            optionsBuilder.UseInMemoryDatabase();
            contextMemory = new DatabaseContext(optionsBuilder.Options);

        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Dispose DB 
        /// </summary>
        public void Dispose()
        {
            //this has no effect 
            if (contextMemory != null)
            {                
                contextMemory.Dispose();
            }
        }


        /// <summary>
        /// Positive Test for ListByAssigneeId method  
        /// </summary>
        /// <returns></returns>       
        [Fact]
        public async Task TasksRepositoryListByAssigneeId()
        {
            // Arrange
            var assigneeId = Guid.NewGuid();
            var taskList = new List<TaskItem>();


            //AssigneeId != assigneeId 
            taskList.Add(new TaskItem()
            {
                AssigneeId = Guid.NewGuid(),
                CreatorId = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Description = "Descr 2",
                Done = false,
                Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Location = "Some location 2",
                Title = "Some title 2"
            });

            taskList.Add(new TaskItem()
            {
                AssigneeId = assigneeId,
                CreatorId = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Description = "Descr",
                Done = false,
                Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Location = "Some location",
                Title = "Some title"
            });

            taskList.Add(new TaskItem()
            {
                AssigneeId = assigneeId,
                CreatorId = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Description = "Descr 2",
                Done = false,
                Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Location = "Some location 2",
                Title = "Some title 2"
            });

            //AssigneeId != assigneeId 
            taskList.Add(new TaskItem()
            {
                AssigneeId = Guid.NewGuid(),
                CreatorId = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Description = "Descr 2",
                Done = false,
                Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Location = "Some location 2",
                Title = "Some title 2"
            });


            //set up inmemory DB            
            contextMemory.TaskItems.AddRange(taskList);

            //save context
            contextMemory.SaveChanges();

            // Act
            var repository = new TaskRepository(contextMemory);
            var result = await repository.ListByAssigneeIdAsync(assigneeId);

            // Assert
            Assert.NotNull(result.Count());

            foreach (var td in result)
            {
                Assert.Equal(assigneeId, td.AssigneeId);
            }

        }

        /// <summary>
        /// test for Add method  
        /// (Skip = "not able to clear DB context yet")
        /// </summary>
        /// <returns></returns>
        [Fact]
        public async Task TasksRepositoryAdd()
        {
            var item = new TaskData()
            {
                AssigneeId = Guid.NewGuid(),
                CreatorId = Guid.NewGuid(),
                Description = "Descr",
                Done = false,
                Location = "Location",
                Title = "Title"
            };


            // Act
            var repository = new TaskRepository(contextMemory);
            var result = await repository.Add(item);

            // Assert
            Assert.Equal(1, contextMemory.TaskItems.Count());
            Assert.NotNull(result.Id);

            var dbRes = contextMemory.TaskItems.Where(s => s.Id == result.Id).SingleOrDefault();
            Assert.NotNull(dbRes);
            Assert.Equal(result.Id, dbRes.Id);
        }


    }
}

我正在使用:

"Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory": "1.0.0"

"Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore": "1.0.0"

"xunit": "2.2.0-beta2-build3300"

推荐答案

来自 文档,

通常,EF 为 AppDomain 中给定类型的所有上下文创建单个 IServiceProvider - 这意味着所有上下文实例共享相同的 InMemory 数据库实例.通过允许传入,可以控制 InMemory 数据库的范围.

Typically, EF creates a single IServiceProvider for all contexts of a given type in an AppDomain - meaning all context instances share the same InMemory database instance. By allowing one to be passed in, you can control the scope of the InMemory database.

不要让测试类一次性使用并尝试以这种方式处理数据上下文,而是为每个测试创建一个新的:

Instead of making the test class disposable and trying to dispose the data context that way, create a new one for each test:

private static DbContextOptions<BloggingContext> CreateNewContextOptions()
{
    // Create a fresh service provider, and therefore a fresh 
    // InMemory database instance.
    var serviceProvider = new ServiceCollection()
        .AddEntityFrameworkInMemoryDatabase()
        .BuildServiceProvider();

    // Create a new options instance telling the context to use an
    // InMemory database and the new service provider.
    var builder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<DatabaseContext>();
    builder.UseInMemoryDatabase()
           .UseInternalServiceProvider(serviceProvider);

    return builder.Options;
}

然后,在每次测试中,使用此方法新建一个数据上下文:

Then, in each test, new up a data context using this method:

using (var context = new DatabaseContext(CreateNewContextOptions()))
{
    // Do all of your data access and assertions in here
}

这种方法应该为每个测试提供一个干净的内存数据库.

This approach should get you a squeaky-clean in-memory database for each test.

这篇关于如何在每个 XUnit 测试中隔离 EF InMemory 数据库的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆