编写重试逻辑的最简洁方法? [英] Cleanest way to write retry logic?
问题描述
有时我需要在放弃之前重试几次操作.我的代码是这样的:
Occasionally I have a need to retry an operation several times before giving up. My code is like:
int retries = 3;
while(true) {
try {
DoSomething();
break; // success!
} catch {
if(--retries == 0) throw;
else Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
}
我想在一个通用的重试函数中重写这个:
I would like to rewrite this in a general retry function like:
TryThreeTimes(DoSomething);
在 C# 中可以吗?TryThreeTimes()
方法的代码是什么?
Is it possible in C#? What would be the code for the TryThreeTimes()
method?
推荐答案
简单地重试相同调用的一揽子 catch 语句如果用作一般异常处理机制可能是危险的.话虽如此,这里有一个基于 lambda 的重试包装器,您可以将其与任何方法一起使用.我选择将重试次数和重试超时作为参数考虑在内,以获得更大的灵活性:
Blanket catch statements that simply retry the same call can be dangerous if used as a general exception handling mechanism. Having said that, here's a lambda-based retry wrapper that you can use with any method. I chose to factor the number of retries and the retry timeout out as parameters for a bit more flexibility:
public static class Retry
{
public static void Do(
Action action,
TimeSpan retryInterval,
int maxAttemptCount = 3)
{
Do<object>(() =>
{
action();
return null;
}, retryInterval, maxAttemptCount);
}
public static T Do<T>(
Func<T> action,
TimeSpan retryInterval,
int maxAttemptCount = 3)
{
var exceptions = new List<Exception>();
for (int attempted = 0; attempted < maxAttemptCount; attempted++)
{
try
{
if (attempted > 0)
{
Thread.Sleep(retryInterval);
}
return action();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
exceptions.Add(ex);
}
}
throw new AggregateException(exceptions);
}
}
您现在可以使用此实用程序方法来执行重试逻辑:
You can now use this utility method to perform retry logic:
Retry.Do(() => SomeFunctionThatCanFail(), TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));
或:
Retry.Do(SomeFunctionThatCanFail, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));
或:
int result = Retry.Do(SomeFunctionWhichReturnsInt, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1), 4);
或者您甚至可以进行 async
重载.
Or you could even make an async
overload.
这篇关于编写重试逻辑的最简洁方法?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!