如何创建 List<T> 的新深层副本(克隆)? [英] How create a new deep copy (clone) of a List&lt;T&gt;?

查看:38
本文介绍了如何创建 List<T> 的新深层副本(克隆)?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

在下面的一段代码中,

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Windows.Forms;

namespace clone_test_01
{

    public partial class MainForm : Form
    {

        public class Book
        {
            public string title = "";

            public Book(string title)
            {
                this.title = title;
            }
        }


        public MainForm()
        {
            InitializeComponent();

            List<Book> books_1 = new List<Book>();
            books_1.Add(  new Book("One")  );
            books_1.Add(  new Book("Two")  );
            books_1.Add(  new Book("Three")  );
            books_1.Add(  new Book("Four")  );

            List<Book> books_2 = new List<Book>(books_1);

            books_2[0].title = "Five";
            books_2[1].title = "Six";

            textBox1.Text = books_1[0].title;
            textBox2.Text = books_1[1].title;
        }
    }

}

我使用一个 Book 对象类型来创建一个 List 并用一些项目填充它,给它们一个唯一的标题(从 'one' 到 '五').

I use a Book object type to create a List<T> and I populate it with a few items giving them a unique title (from 'one' to 'five').

然后我创建Listbook_2 = 新列表(books_1).

从这一点来看,我知道它是列表对象的克隆,但是 book_2 中的 book 对象仍然是 books_1 中 book 对象的引用.通过对 books_2 的前两个元素进行更改,然后在 TextBox 中检查 book_1 的那些相同元素,可以证明这一点.

From this point, I know it's a clone of the list object, BUT the book objects from book_2 are still a reference from the book objects in books_1. It's proven by making changes on the two first elements of books_2, and then checking those same elements of book_1 in a TextBox.

books_1[0].title 和 books_2[1].title 确实已更改为 books_2[0].title 和 books_2[1].title.

现在是问题

我们如何创建 List 的新硬拷贝?这个想法是 books_1books_2 变得完全相互独立.

How do we create a new hard copy of a List<T>? The idea is that books_1 and books_2 become completely independent of each other.

我很失望微软没有像 Ruby 那样使用 clone() 方法提供简洁、快速和简单的解决方案.

I'm disappointed Microsoft didn't offer a neat, fast and easy solution like Ruby are doing with the clone() method.

帮助者真正棒的是使用我的代码并使用可行的解决方案对其进行更改,以便它可以被编译和工作.我认为这将真正帮助尝试了解针对此问题提供的解决方案的新手.

What would be really awesome from helpers is to use my code and alter it with a workable solution so it can be compiled and work. I think it will truly help newbies trying to understand offered solutions for this issue.

请注意,Book 类可能更复杂并具有更多属性.我尽量保持简单.

Note that the Book class could be more complex and have more properties. I tried to keep things simple.

推荐答案

您需要创建新的 Book 对象,然后将它们放入新的 List:

You need to create new Book objects then put those in a new List:

List<Book> books_2 = books_1.Select(book => new Book(book.title)).ToList();

更新:稍微简单一点... List 有一个方法叫做 ConvertAll 返回一个新列表:

Update: Slightly simpler... List<T> has a method called ConvertAll that returns a new list:

List<Book> books_2 = books_1.ConvertAll(book => new Book(book.title));

这篇关于如何创建 List<T> 的新深层副本(克隆)?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆