Facebook 以外的服务是否使用 Open Graph? [英] Do services other than Facebook use Open Graph?

问题描述

除 Facebook 之外的其他服务在抓取页面以共享信息时是否会使用 Open Graph 标签?

Will other services other than Facebook use Open Graph tags when scraping the page for sharing information?

意思是，如果我在页面上有一个 AddThis 按钮(例如)，它允许分享到 Facebook、Google+ 和 Pinterest 等，其他任何服务是否也会尊重这些元标记?或者通常是我们专门为 Facebook 做的事情?

Meaning, if I have an AddThis button (for example) on a page, which allows sharing to Facebook, Google+, and Pinterest etc., will any of the other services also honor those meta tags? Or is generally something we do specifically for Facebook?

推荐答案

答案似乎是肯定的......有点.

The answer appears to be yes... sort of.

由于 Open Graph 是一种开放协议，因此它并不意味着特定于 Facebook.看来，虽然并非所有供应商都可能尊重这些标签，但大多数都这样做.

Since Open Graph is an open protocol of sorts, it's not meant to be Facebook specific. And it appears that while not all vendors may respect the tags yet, most do.

以 Pinterest 为例.如果您使用Pin"按钮由AddThis，它将使用og:image"、og:description"和og:url"标签.然而，通过我自己的实验，Pinterest 书签和直接通过他们的网站添加似乎没有使用开放图元数据.

Take Pinterest for example. If you use the "Pin" button provided by AddThis, it will use the "og:image", "og:description", and "og:url" tags. However, through my own experimentation, the Pinterest bookmarklet and adding directly through their site does not appear to use the open graph metadata.

至于 Google Plus，答案是 这里.基本上，他们给schema.org"最高的权重，但如果它们不存在，它们将依靠开放图标签，如果它们不存在，它们将依靠页面内容，例如标题"等.

As for Google Plus, that's answered here. Basically, they give "schema.org" the highest weight, but if they do not exist they will fall back on open graph tags, and if they do not exist they will fall back on page content, like "title", etc.

这篇关于Facebook 以外的服务是否使用 Open Graph?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！