什么是更好的方法:使用 Express 或 nginx 提供静态文件? [英] What's the better approach: serving static files with Express or nginx?

问题描述

我正在构建一个 Node.js 应用程序，并使用 nginx 作为反向代理.我的应用程序有一些我需要提供的静态文件和一个 Socket.io 服务器.

I'm building a Node.js applications and I'm using nginx as a reverse proxy. My application has some static files I need to serve and a Socket.io server.

我知道我可以直接使用 Express 提供静态文件(使用 express.static 中间件).我也可以将 nginx 直接指向我的静态文件所在的目录，这样它们就会由 nginx 提供服务.

I know that I can serve static files directly with Express (using express.static middleware). Also I can point nginx directly to the directory where my static files are located, so they would be served by nginx.

那么，问题是:哪种方法更好?使用每种方法时我会面临哪些利弊?

So, the question: which one is the better approach? Which pros and cons can I face while using each approach?

推荐答案

for development: express，主要是因为它提供了灵活性...你可以在开发过程中很容易地改变你的静态位置和结构

for development: express, mainly because of flexibility it provides... you can change your static location and structure very easily during development

用于生产:nginx，因为它要快得多.Node/express 很适合执行逻辑，但对于提供原始内容......没有什么能打败 nginx.您还可以获得额外的功能，例如 gzip、负载平衡...

for production: nginx, because its much much faster. Node/express are good for executing logic, but for serving raw content... nothing can beat nginx. You also get additional capabilities such as gzip, load balancing...

尽管如此，这个问题已经在stackoverflow中被问过很多次了:见

Nevertheless, this question has been asked in stackoverflow a number of times already: see

• node.js 本身或用于服务的 nginx 前端静态文件? 或
• 仅使用 Node.js 与使用 Node.js 和 Apache/Nginx 或
• 哪个最有效:直接由 nginx 提供静态文件，还是通过 nginx 反向代理由节点提供服务?

• node.js itself or nginx frontend for serving static files? or
• Using Node.js only vs. using Node.js with Apache/Nginx or
• Which is most efficient : serving static files directly by nginx or by node via nginx reverse proxy?

这篇关于什么是更好的方法:使用 Express 或 nginx 提供静态文件?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！