siutable工具和技术，电子健康系统？ [英] siutable tool and technology for electronic health system?

问题描述

你好，我是打算开发一个EHR（电子健康记录系统）我是新来这个领域，并希望讨论并获取有关我必须用于此目的的什么工具技术建议：

hello i am going to develop an EHR (Electronic Health Record System) i am new to this field and want to discuss and get the suggestion about what tool technology i have to use for this purpose:

下面是我对电子病历和可用的工具，它

here is my research about EHR and available tools for it

1）我要去有关Java作为电子病历讨论的是一个基于Web的系统，J2EE将在内核级Java的解决方案，并为我要去，所以我需要为它的最一些标准协议，全球化我的系统有用和AP preciated一个是 HL7 CDA 2.0 一件事java的我喜欢的是它提供了的Java CAPS 与全面推行HL7协议。这使我的工作有点轻松，第二件事关于Java是这是非常有效的数据CENTERED 应用程序作为矿山之一，但问题是系统的可扩展性是非常昂贵的和时间服用。和Java是在客户端慢一点，可以影响的停机时间应该我来说非常少接近为零我的系统。在最后，我需要一个有吸引力的用户界面。而最想做的事情是隐私和安全。

1) i am going to discuss about java as an EHR is a web based system so J2EE will be the solution for java at core level and as i am going to globalize my system so i need some standard protocol for it the most useful and appreciated one is HL7 CDA 2.0 one thing about java i like is it provides JAVA CAPS with full implementation of HL7 protocol. it make my work bit easy the second thing about java is it is very efficient for DATA CENTERED application as mine one is but the problem is with the scalability of system that is much expensive and time taking. and java is bit slower on client side that can effect downtime that should me very less approaching to zero for my system. and at last i need a attractive user interface. and the most wanted thing is privacy and security.

2）的另一种选择是 PHP 做所有上述这是更便宜和更短的时间服用可扩展性，可能有助于实现良好的人机界面和更快客户端，但问号数据中心的环境和安全性。

2) the other option is PHP for doing all as above described it is less expensive and less time taking for scalability,may contribute to achieve a good interface and a faster client side but question mark on data centric environment and security.

3）最后一个是MS的 ASP.NET 没有关于安全和隐私，但开发和维护非常昂贵，没有平台的独立性，什么是速度怀疑为响应和停机时间？

3) the last one is the MS's ASP.NET no doubt about security and privacy but very much expensive to develop and maintain and no platform independence and what about speed that is response and down times?

我已经讨论了高达我所知的可能希望你的人告诉我哪一个是最好的实现私密性，安全性，速度和可扩展性的最佳成本。

i have discussed the possibilities upto my best knowledge hope u people advise me which one will be the best to attain privacy, security, speed and scalability on best cost.

感谢名单提前。

推荐答案

由于自1983年以来电子​​病历实现者，我建议你找，提供了一个用户界面，允许多个输入，包括键盘，鼠标，触控，语音语言及触笔，及潜在地在多个设备包括电话和个人电脑运行。如果正确写入不应该提供可扩展性问题，在服务器端。

As an EHR implementor since 1983, I'd suggest you look for a language that provides a user interface that allows multiple inputs including keyboard, mouse, touch, voice and stylus, and potentially runs on multiple devices including phones and PCs. The server side if written correctly should not offer scaleability issues.

至于HL7，你要使用服务器端无论如何，所以我不认为这是有关你如何写你的客户。

As for HL7, you're going to use that server side anyway so I don't think it's relevant to how you write your clients.

这篇关于siutable工具和技术，电子健康系统？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！