谷歌云存储是一个自动的全球 CDN 吗? [英] Is Google Cloud Storage an automagical global CDN?
问题描述
我正在尝试设置一个 Google Cloud Storage 存储分区来存储和提供我网站的所有静态对象.我还尝试将该存储桶中的所有对象推送到 Google Cloud CDN 提供的所有全球边缘站点.
我在 Google Cloud Storage 上创建了一个存储分区:cdn.mysite.com.我为存储桶 location 设置选择了美国"多区域.
我的假设是，出于高持久性目的，存储在此存储桶中的任何对象都将复制到所有 us-* 区域，但不会推送到所有用于 CDN 目的的 Google Cloud CDN 全球边缘站点.
还是我的美国"多区域存储桶中的所有对象都已自动推送到所有 Google Cloud CDN 边缘站点?
我大吃一惊，我无法弄清楚我的存储桶是否已经是 CDN.即使经过两天的搜索(具有讽刺意味的是，谷歌).
在此先感谢您的帮助.
我见过的关于 Cloud Storage 边缘缓存与 Cloud CDN 的最佳讨论是在 Google Cloud Next '18 会议期间最佳实践存储类、可靠性、性能和可扩展性.整个视频很有用，但这里是内容分发主题的
I’m attempting to setup a Google Cloud Storage bucket to store and serve all the static objects for my site. I’m also attempting to push all the objects in that bucket out to all the global edge locations offered by Google Cloud CDN.
I’ve created a bucket on Google Cloud Storage: cdn.mysite.com. I chose "US" multi-region for the bucket location setting.
My assumption is that any object stored in this bucket will be replicated to all the us-* regions for high-durability purposes, but not pushed out to all the Google Cloud CDN global edge locations for CDN purposes.
Or are all my objects in my "US" multi-region bucket already automagically pushed out to all of Google Cloud CDN edge locations?
I’m gobsmacked that I can’t figure out whether or not my bucket is already a CDN or not. Even after two days of searching (Google, ironically).
Thanks in advance for any help.
The best discussion I've seen of Cloud Storage edge caching vs. Cloud CDN was during the Google Cloud Next '18 session Best Practices for Storage Classes, Reliability, Performance and Scalability. The entire video is useful, but here's link to the content distribution topic.
One key note from the summary is that edge caching gives you many of the benefits of a CDN, but you still pay for data egress. The Cloud CDN gives you caching, which can lower the cost of egress. They also outlined a couple other options.
这篇关于谷歌云存储是一个自动的全球 CDN 吗?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
