Meteor、Ember.js 和 Backbone.js 之间的主要区别是什么? [英] What are the key differences between Meteor, Ember.js and Backbone.js?

问题描述

学习 Ember.js/Backbone.js 已经在我的待办事项清单上有一段时间了.现在 Meteor 已经出来了，我只是想知道是否有任何有 Meteor、Ember.js 和 Backbone.js 经验的人可以总结一下主要的区别和优点对于没有任何经验的人来说，这三个 JavaScript 框架的优缺点.

Learning Ember.js / Backbone.js has been on my to-do list for a while. Now that Meteor is out, I am just wondering if anyone with experience of Meteor, Ember.js and Backbone.js can summarize the key differences and pros and cons of these three JavaScript frameworks for a person without any experience for any of them.

具体来说，我想知道每个框架更适合哪些任务，为什么其他框架不适合.

Specifically, I would like to know which tasks each framework is more suitable for, and why the others aren't.

现在我在 Meteor 上读了更多，它似乎更类似于 Knockout.js 而不是 Backbone.js.所以也欢迎任何与 Knockout.js 的比较.

now that I read a little bit more on Meteor, it seems to be more similar to Knockout.js rather than Backbone.js. So any comparison with Knockout.js is welcome too.

推荐答案

这里有对各种 MVx JS 框架的很好的总结/比较http://codebrief.com/2012/01/the-top-10-javascript-mvc-frameworks-reviewed/随后在评论中也进行了很好的讨论.我想我在这里看到了戈登(他写的)，所以也许你会得到他的答复.

There is a nice run down/comparison of various MVx JS frameworks here http://codebrief.com/2012/01/the-top-10-javascript-mvc-frameworks-reviewed/ it's followed by a good discussion in the comments too. I think I've seen Gordon (who wrote it) on here so maybe you'll get a reply from him.

我想说，如果您想学习这种应用程序开发风格，那么一方面，周围的大量开源主干示例可能对您有好处.但另一方面，虽然是新的，但 Ember package 实际上是比主干更完整的 IMO.

I'd say if you are looking to learn this style of application development then on the one hand, the wealth of open source backbone examples around could be good for you. But on the other hand, although new, the Ember package is actually more complete IMO than backbone.

两者都使您能够以各种可能令人困惑的方式实现事物，但 Ember 提供了更多您必须在主干中作为标准编写的代码，这对我个人而言对于快速原型设计比大量可用的主干示例.

Both give you the ability to implement things in a variety of ways which can be confusing, but Ember provides more of the code that you would have to write yourself in backbone as standard which for me personally is more important for rapid prototyping than the wealth of backbone examples available.

对于主干的数据持久化有更成熟的插件，但是围绕 Ember 有一个很大的社区嗡嗡声，并且许多 contrib 库正在取得很大进展.我(和其他人)在 Stack Overflow 上对一个相对较新的框架做出了高质量的回应，这让我感到惊喜.

There are more mature plugings for data persistence for backbone, but there is a great community buzz around Ember and lots of contrib libraries are making great progress. I've been pleasantly surprised with how quick I (and others) have had quality responses for a relatively new framework here on Stack Overflow.

当你说流星时，我们指的是完全不同的东西.如果你想在客户端和服务器端做更多的代码重用，那么看看最近开源的 yahoo mojito https://github.com/yahoo/mojito 在 node.js 上运行——上周我一直在搞弄它，如果你熟悉了主干/余烬或其他任何一个，它很快就会掌握与.

When you say meteor we are talking about totally other stuff. If you wanted to do more with code re-use on both client and server side then take a look the recently open sourced yahoo mojito https://github.com/yahoo/mojito running on node.js - I've been messing around with it over the last week, and If you become familiar with backbone/ember or any of the others its a snap to get to grips with.

我还应该说，我在某些生产系统上使用了 Knockout.js，但从未将其用于完全成熟的应用程序".我已经将它连接到一个 mongo 界面，用于深入查看和分页存储在 mongo 中的日志.我真的很喜欢它，但我不喜欢在里面建造任何太大的东西.

I should also say I have Knockout.js in use on some production systems but have never used it for a fully fledged 'application'. I've got it hooked up to a mongo interface for drilling down into and pageing logs stored in mongo. I really like it, but I wouldn't feel comfortable building anything too big in it.

嗯，这有点啰嗦 - 不是吗:)

Well, that's a bit of a ramble - isn't it :)

很高兴与任何感兴趣的人讨论更多.我已经在愤怒/生产中使用了许多这样的框架(包括未在前 10 名"文章中列出的内容)，工作人员已经厌倦了听到我谈论 JS，我认为 :-D

Quite happy to talk more about it with anyone who is interested. I've used a number of these frameworks in anger/production (including things not listed in the 'top 10' article) and people at work are sick of hearing me talk about JS i think :-D

这篇关于Meteor、Ember.js 和 Backbone.js 之间的主要区别是什么?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！