是什么视图，并在ASP.NET MVC一个PartialView之间的区别？ [英] What is the difference between a View and a PartialView in ASP.NET MVC?
问题描述
是什么查看和ASP.NET MVC一个PartialView区别？
What is the difference between a View and a PartialView in ASP.NET MVC?
乍一看需要双方似乎不明显给我。
At first glance the need for both seems non-obvious to me.
推荐答案
在理论上，答案是：的部分观点是，你嵌入主视图中的一个子视图 - 东西，你可能会重用跨多个视图，就像一个侧边栏。的
在实践中，答案是：很少
在理论上，局部视图比标准的看法更为轻巧，但它是完全确定通过一项常规，以的RenderPartial 和性能似乎是如出一辙。我经常使用常规的.aspx意见部分的观点，因为你可以让他们以提供像您可以在ASP.NET的WebForms用户控件做模板化内容中引用的主视图。见<一href=\"http://jeffreypalermo.com/blog/asp-net-mvc-and-the-templated-partial-view-death-to-ascx/\">here.
In theory, partial views are more lightweight than standard views, but it's perfectly OK to pass a "regular" view to RenderPartial and the performance seems to be exactly the same. I frequently use regular .aspx views as "partial" views because you can make them reference a master view in order to provide templated content like what you can do with UserControls in ASP.NET WebForms. See here.
部分观点更像一个门户网站的Web部件 - 他们是完全独立的对象。使用他们，如果布局简单而静态的，或者如果你是恼火通过智能感知错误，当你不具备＆LT; HTML＆GT; 和＆LT;车身方式＆gt; 标签标准视图
Partial views are more like web parts on a portal - they are completely self-contained objects. Use them if the layout is simple and static, or if you're annoyed by the Intellisense errors when you don't have the <html> and <body> tags in a standard View.
这篇关于是什么视图，并在ASP.NET MVC一个PartialView之间的区别？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
