这真的是一种简化吗? [英] Is this really a simplification?

问题描述

所以我有一个带有 Id 字段的非常简单的类，并且 Id 可以在构造函数中设置.

So I have a pretty simple class with an Id field, and the Id can be set in the constructor.

通常我会使用 this 来清楚地标识类属性而不是方法参数.对我来说，这似乎更清楚.

Typically I will use this to clearly identify the class property as opposed to the method argument. To me this seems clearer.

IDE0003 要我删除this，并显示名称可以简化"，对吗?

IDE0003 wants me to remove the this, with the message 'Name can be simplified', is that correct?

这对我来说似乎不太清楚，而且还允许大小写错误很容易导致 id = id.

This seems less clear to me, and also allows a casing error to easily result in id = id.

推荐答案

this 关键字几乎总是不必要的，参见 你什么时候使用this"?关键字?.

The this keyword almost always is unnecessary, see When do you use the "this" keyword?.

允许大小写错误很容易导致 id = id

allows a casing error to easily result in id = id

这本身会产生另一个警告:

That will yield another warning on its own:

分配给相同的变量；你的意思是指派别的东西吗?

Assignment made to same variable; did you mean to assign something else?

这篇关于这真的是一种简化吗?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！