RichFaces 与 PrimeFaces(为了性能) [英] RichFaces Vs PrimeFaces (for performance)

问题描述

我正在使用 JSF 2.0，我正在寻找一个在性能方面具有最小负载的组件库.如果我可以在 RichFaces 和 PrimeFaces 之间进行选择，使用哪个更好?两者的优缺点是什么?

I am using JSF 2.0 and I am looking for a copmponent library with minimal load in terms of performance. Which one is better to use if I have choice between RichFaces and PrimeFaces? What are the advantages and disadvantages of both?

推荐答案

目前 Primefaces 是我所知道的(目前)唯一具有完整 JSF2 实现的组件库.有bug和问题，一些组件需要重写，但开发速度快如闪电，沟通非常好(我不记得他们支持论坛上有一个帖子没有得到Cagatay本人的回答)，而且它正在朝着正确的方向前进(新的主题系统就是恕我直言的一个例子).我认为 Primefaces 会在年底成为成熟的 JSF2 组件库.

Currently Primefaces is the only component lib that I know of (for now) that has a complete JSF2 implementation. There are bugs and problems, and some components are to be rewritten, but development is lightning fast, the communication is excellent (I don't remember a single post on their support forum that hasn't been answered by Cagatay himself), and it is moving in the right direction (the new theming system is an example of that IMHO). I think Primefaces will be a mature JSF2 component lib by the end of the year.

还有一些其他的，比如我玩了很短的时间的 Icefaces，但它们移动缓慢，就像我说的，它们都不是真正的 JSF2.部分原因是 Mojarra(Sun 参考实现)存在很多问题，并且这些组件库开发人员正在等待修复一些严重的错误.

There are some others, like Icefaces that I played with for a short time, but they are moving slowly and like I said, none of them are really JSF2 yet. Part of the reason for this is that Mojarra, the Sun reference implementation is quite buggy, and there some serious bugs that these component lib developers are waiting for to get fixed.

所以我现在肯定会投票给 Primefaces，我们稍后会看到它的样子.

So my vote is definitely on Primefaces for now, we'll see how it will look like later.

这篇关于RichFaces 与 PrimeFaces(为了性能)的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！