在 C# 中轻松创建支持索引的属性 [英] Easy creation of properties that support indexing in C#

查看:13
本文介绍了在 C# 中轻松创建支持索引的属性的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

在 C# 中,我发现 索引属性有用.例如:

In C# I find indexed properties extremely useful. For example:

var myObj = new MyClass();
myObj[42] = "hello"; 
Console.WriteLine(myObj[42]);

但是据我所知,没有语法糖来支持本身支持索引的字段(如果我错了,请纠正我).例如:

However as far as I know there is no syntactic sugar to support fields that themselves support indexing (please correct me if I am wrong). For example:

var myObj = new MyClass();
myObj.field[42] = "hello"; 
Console.WriteLine(myObj.field[42]);

我需要这个的原因是我已经在我的班级上使用了 index 属性,但是我有 GetNumX()GetX()SetX() 函数如下:

The reason I need this is that I am already using the index property on my class, but I have GetNumX(), GetX(), and SetX() functions as follows:

public int NumTargetSlots {  
    get { return _Maker.NumRefs; }  
}
public ReferenceTarget GetTarget(int n) {
    return ReferenceTarget.Create(_Maker.GetReference(n));
}
public void SetTarget(int n, ReferenceTarget rt) {
    _Maker.ReplaceReference(n, rt._Target, true);
}

正如您可能看到的,将这些作为一个可索引的字段属性公开会更有意义.每次我想要语法糖时,我都可以编写一个自定义类来实现这一点,但所有样板代码似乎都没有必要.

As you can probably see exposing these as one indexable field property would make more sense. I could write a custom class to achieve this every time I want the syntactic sugar but all of the boilerplate code just seem unnecessary.

所以我编写了一个自定义类来封装样板文件,并使创建可索引的属性变得容易.通过这种方式,我可以添加一个新属性,如下所示:

So I wrote a custom class to encapsulate the boilerplate and to make it easy to create properties that can be indexed . This way I can add a new property as follows:

public IndexedProperty<ReferenceTarget> TargetArray  {
    get { 
       return new IndexedProperty<int, ReferenceTarget>(
           (int n) => GetTarget(n), 
           (int n, ReferenceTarget rt) => SetTarget(n, rt));
       }
}

这个新的 IndexedProperty 类的代码如下所示:

The code for this new IndexedProperty class looks like:

public class IndexedProperty<IndexT, ValueT>
{
    Action<IndexT, ValueT> setAction;
    Func<IndexT, ValueT> getFunc;

    public IndexedProperty(Func<IndexT, ValueT> getFunc, Action<IndexT, ValueT> setAction)
    {
        this.getFunc = getFunc;
        this.setAction = setAction;
    }

    public ValueT this[IndexT i]
    {
        get {
            return getFunc(i);
        }
        set {
            setAction(i, value);
        }
    }
}

所以我的问题是:是否有更好的方法来完成所有这些?

具体来说,在 C# 中是否有更惯用的方法来创建可索引字段属性,如果没有,我该如何改进我的 IndexedProperty 类?

Well to be specific, is there a more idiomatic way in C# to create an indexable field property, and if not how could I improve my IndexedProperty class?

经过进一步研究,Jon Skeet 将其称为命名索引器".

After further research, Jon Skeet calls this a "named indexer".

推荐答案

我发现你的想法很有用,所以我扩展了它.这在技术上可能不是一个正确的答案,因为我不确定它是否完全回答了您的问题,但我认为它可能对来这里寻找财产索引器的人有用.

I found your idea useful, so I extended it. This may not technically be a proper answer since I'm not sure it squarely answers your question, but I thought it might be useful to people who came here looking for property indexers.

首先,我需要能够支持 get-only 和 set-only 属性,因此我针对这些场景对您的代码进行了一些细微的修改:

First, I needed to be able to support get-only and set-only properties, so I made a slight variation of your code for these scenarios:

获取和设置(非常小的改动):

public class IndexedProperty<TIndex, TValue>
{
    readonly Action<TIndex, TValue> SetAction;
    readonly Func<TIndex, TValue> GetFunc;

    public IndexedProperty(Func<TIndex, TValue> getFunc, Action<TIndex, TValue> setAction)
    {
        this.GetFunc = getFunc;
        this.SetAction = setAction;
    }

    public TValue this[TIndex i]
    {
        get
        {
            return GetFunc(i);
        }
        set
        {
            SetAction(i, value);
        }
    }
}

仅获取:

public class ReadOnlyIndexedProperty<TIndex, TValue>
{
    readonly Func<TIndex, TValue> GetFunc;

    public ReadOnlyIndexedProperty(Func<TIndex, TValue> getFunc)
    {
        this.GetFunc = getFunc;
    }

    public TValue this[TIndex i]
    {
        get
        {
            return GetFunc(i);
        }
    }
}

仅设置:

public class WriteOnlyIndexedProperty<TIndex, TValue>
{
    readonly Action<TIndex, TValue> SetAction;

    public WriteOnlyIndexedProperty(Action<TIndex, TValue> setAction)
    {
        this.SetAction = setAction;
    }

    public TValue this[TIndex i]
    {
        set 
        {
            SetAction(i, value);
        }
    }
}

示例

这是一个简单的使用示例.我从 Collection 继承并创建了一个命名索引器,正如 Jon Skeet 所说的那样.这个例子是为了简单而不实用:

Here's a simple usage example. I inherit from Collection and create a named indexer, as Jon Skeet called it. This example is intended to be simple, not practical:

public class ExampleCollection<T> : Collection<T>
{
    public IndexedProperty<int, T> ExampleProperty
    {
        get
        {
            return new IndexedProperty<int, T>(GetIndex, SetIndex);
        }
    }

    private T GetIndex(int index)
    {
        return this[index];
    }
    private void SetIndex(int index, T value)
    {
        this[index] = value;
    }
}

ExampleCollection in the Wild

这个匆忙构建的单元测试显示了在项目中使用 ExampleCollection 时的外观:

This hastily constructed unit test shows how it looks when you ExampleCollection in a project:

[TestClass]
public class IndexPropertyTests
{
    [TestMethod]
    public void IndexPropertyTest()
    {
        var MyExample = new ExampleCollection<string>();
        MyExample.Add("a");
        MyExample.Add("b");

        Assert.IsTrue(MyExample.ExampleProperty[0] == "a");
        Assert.IsTrue(MyExample.ExampleProperty[1] == "b");

        MyExample.ExampleProperty[0] = "c";

        Assert.IsTrue(MyExample.ExampleProperty[0] == "c");

    }
}

最后,如果你想使用 get-only 和 set-only 版本,看起来像这样:

Finally, if you want to use the get-only and set-only versions, that looks like this:

    public ReadOnlyIndexedProperty<int, T> ExampleProperty
    {
        get
        {
            return new ReadOnlyIndexedProperty<int, T>(GetIndex);
        }
    }

或者:

    public WriteOnlyIndexedProperty<int, T> ExampleProperty
    {
        get
        {
            return new WriteOnlyIndexedProperty<int, T>(SetIndex);
        }
    }

在这两种情况下,结果的工作方式与您期望的 get-only/set-only 属性的行为方式相同.

In both cases, the result works the way you would expect a get-only/set-only property to behave.

这篇关于在 C# 中轻松创建支持索引的属性的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆