你使用 Emacs 标签栏吗? [英] Do you use Emacs tabbar?

问题描述

emacs tabbar.el 包为每个窗口添加(缓冲)选项卡，并且是 aquamacs 的标准配置，可以通过 emacs-goodies-el 包添加到 emacs23.

The emacs tabbar.el package adds (buffer)tabs to each window and comes standard with aquamacs and can be added to emacs23 with the emacs-goodies-el package.

你们中的铁杆 emacs 用户是否真的在使用 tabbar?我有点习惯使用选项卡，但我想知道没有它们的工作是否会更有效率，以及除了检查您的缓冲区列表 (Cx Cb) 之外是否还有其他方法可以了解您当前的项目文件.

Are any of you hardcore emacs users actually using tabbar? I'm sort of used to having tabs, but I would like to know if working without them could be more productive, and if there are other ways besides checking your bufferlist (C-x C-b) to get an overview of your current project files.

顺便说一句，我真的很喜欢 textmate 的项目抽屉(和标签)，但在 emacs 中任何类似的东西看起来都非常可怕.

As a side note, I really like textmate's project drawer (and tabs), but anything similar in emacs looks just plain hideous.

推荐答案

我试过使用它，但我觉得它限制了我的工作流程而不是改进它.有很多优秀的 Emacs 模式可以帮助组织许多缓冲区，我只是不觉得将缓冲区映射到选项卡是其中一种方式.

I've tried using it, but I felt it constraint my workflow rather than improve it. There are a lot of excellent Emacs modes to help with the organization of many buffers and I simply don't feel mapping buffers to tabs is one of those ways.

想想最基本的场景——很多标签.不同的程序如何处理 - 限制最大选项卡(IntelliJ IDEA)；启用标签栏滚动(Firefox)；无限缩小标签大小(谷歌浏览器)；创建选项卡行(IntelliJ IDEA)...这些解决方案都不是那么好，而且由于在 Emacs 中没有选项卡，我们可以少担心一个问题.至少这是我的主观意见 - 其他人肯定会不同意...我个人只需要 ido 和 iswitchb.

Just think about the most basic scenario - a lot of tabs. How different programs deal with it - limit the maximum tabs(IntelliJ IDEA); enable tabs bar scrolling(Firefox); infinitely reducing the tabs size(Google Chrome); creating rows of tabs(IntelliJ IDEA)... None of this solutions is that great and by not having tabs in Emacs we have one less problem to worry about. At least this is my subjective opinion - others will most certainly disagree... I personally need nothing more than ido and and iswitchb.

ido 实战视频:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsgPNVIMkIE

这篇关于你使用 Emacs 标签栏吗?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！