如何解决缺少协与IReadOnlyDictionary的? [英] How to get around lack of covariance with IReadOnlyDictionary?

查看:121
本文介绍了如何解决缺少协与IReadOnlyDictionary的?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想揭露与一个只读接口持有对象的只读字典。在内部,字典是可写的,等等都是内(请参阅下面的例子code)的对象。我的问题是IReadOnlyDictionary不支持,因为在这个问题<一所列的理由协变转换href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2149589/idictionarytkey-tvalue-in-net-4-not-covariant">here.这意味着我不能暴露我的内部字典作为一个只有一个读。

所以我的问题是,有没有一种有效的方法,以我的内部字典转换为IReadOnlyDictionary,或者一些其他的方式来处理呢?我能想到的选项是:

  1. 在保持两个内置词典和保持同步。
  2. 创建一个新的字典访问属性时,和之内。投中的所有对象
  3. 在内部使用它铸IReadOnly的回NotReadOnly。

1似乎是一个痛苦,2似乎非常低效。 3听起来就像是最有希望的时刻,但仍是丑陋的。难道我有什么其他选择?

 公共类ExposesReadOnly
{
    私人字典&LT; INT,NotReadOnly&GT; InternalDict {获得;组; }
    公共IReadOnlyDictionary&LT; INT,IReadOnly&GT; PublicList
    {
        得到
        {
            //这不工作...
            返回this.InternalDict;
        }
    }

    //这个类可以在内部修改,但我不希望
    //展示这一功能。
    私有类NotReadOnly:IReadOnly
    {
        公共字符串名称{;组; }
    }
}

公共接口IReadOnly
{
    字符串名称{; }
}
 

解决方案

您可以编写自己的只读包装词典,如:

 公共类ReadOnlyDictionaryWrapper&LT; TKEY的,TValue,TReadOnlyValue&GT; :IReadOnlyDictionary&LT; TKEY的,TReadOnlyValue&GT;其中,TValue:TReadOnlyValue
{
    私人的IDictionary&LT; TKEY的,TValue&GT; _字典;

    公共ReadOnlyDictionaryWrapper(IDictionary的&LT; TKEY的,TValue&GT;字典)
    {
        如果(字典== NULL)抛出新ArgumentNullException(辞海);
        _dictionary =字典;
    }
    公共BOOL的containsKey(TKEY的键){返回_dictionary.ContainsKey(键); }

    公开的IEnumerable&LT; TKEY的&GT;键{{返回_dictionary.Keys; }}

    公共BOOL TryGetValue(TKEY的钥匙,走出TReadOnlyValue值)
    {
        TValue伏;
        VAR的结果= _dictionary.TryGetValue(重点,走出V);
        值= V;
        返回结果;
    }

    公开的IEnumerable&LT; TReadOnlyValue&GT;值{{返回_dictionary.Values​​.Cast&LT; TReadOnlyValue&GT;(); }}

    公共TReadOnlyValue这个[TKEY的关键] {{返回_dictionary [关键]; }}

    公众诠释计数{{返回_dictionary.Count; }}

    公众的IEnumerator&LT; KeyValuePair&LT; TKEY的,TReadOnlyValue&GT;&GT;的GetEnumerator()
    {
        返回_dictionary
                    。选择(X =&gt;新建KeyValuePair&LT; TKEY的,TReadOnlyValue&GT;(x.Key,x.Value))
                    .GetEnumerator();
    }

    System.Collections.IEnumerator System.Collections.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
    {
        返回this.GetEnumerator();
    }
}
 

I'm trying to expose a read-only dictionary that holds objects with a read-only interface. Internally, the dictionary is write-able, and so are the objects within (see below example code). My problem is that IReadOnlyDictionary doesn't support covariant conversions because of the reason outlined in the question here. This means I can't just expose my internal dictionary as a read only one.

So my question is, is there an efficient way to convert my internal dictionary to an IReadOnlyDictionary, or some other way to handle this? The options I can think of are:

  1. Hold two internal dictionaries and keep them in sync.
  2. Create a new dictionary when the property is accessed and cast all the objects within.
  3. Cast the IReadOnly's back to NotReadOnly when using it internally.

1 seems like a pain, 2 seems highly inefficient. 3 sounds like the most promising at the moment, but is still ugly. Do I have any other options?

public class ExposesReadOnly
{
    private Dictionary<int, NotReadOnly> InternalDict { get; set; }
    public IReadOnlyDictionary<int, IReadOnly> PublicList
    {
        get
        {
            // This doesn't work...
            return this.InternalDict;
        }
    }

    // This class can be modified internally, but I don't want
    // to expose this functionality.
    private class NotReadOnly : IReadOnly
    {
        public string Name { get; set; }
    }
}

public interface IReadOnly
{
    string Name { get; }
}

解决方案

You could write your own read-only wrapper for the dictionary, e.g.:

public class ReadOnlyDictionaryWrapper<TKey, TValue, TReadOnlyValue> : IReadOnlyDictionary<TKey, TReadOnlyValue> where TValue : TReadOnlyValue
{
    private IDictionary<TKey, TValue> _dictionary;

    public ReadOnlyDictionaryWrapper(IDictionary<TKey, TValue> dictionary)
    {
        if (dictionary == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("dictionary");
        _dictionary = dictionary;
    }
    public bool ContainsKey(TKey key) { return _dictionary.ContainsKey(key); }

    public IEnumerable<TKey> Keys { get { return _dictionary.Keys; } }

    public bool TryGetValue(TKey key, out TReadOnlyValue value)
    {
        TValue v;
        var result = _dictionary.TryGetValue(key, out v);
        value = v;
        return result;
    }

    public IEnumerable<TReadOnlyValue> Values { get { return _dictionary.Values.Cast<TReadOnlyValue>(); } }

    public TReadOnlyValue this[TKey key] { get { return _dictionary[key]; } }

    public int Count { get { return _dictionary.Count; } }

    public IEnumerator<KeyValuePair<TKey, TReadOnlyValue>> GetEnumerator()
    {
        return _dictionary
                    .Select(x => new KeyValuePair<TKey, TReadOnlyValue>(x.Key, x.Value))
                    .GetEnumerator();
    }

    System.Collections.IEnumerator System.Collections.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
    {
        return this.GetEnumerator();
    }
}

这篇关于如何解决缺少协与IReadOnlyDictionary的?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆